Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

J.Vanathi Vs The Chief Secretary

J.Vanathi vs The Chief Secretary

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Orders Decided Jun 25, 2026
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1651113

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
WP(MD)/17393/2026

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

J.Vanathi

Respondent

The Chief Secretary

Excerpt

before the madurai bench of madras high court dated: 25-06-2026coramthe honourable mr justice n. sathish kumar and the honourable mr.justice m.jothiraman wp(md)no.17393 of 2026 j.vanathi petitioner(s) vs. respondent(s) for petitioner(s): mr.a.nallathambi raj for respondent(s): mr.m.s.parthiban, counsel for state for r1 to r3 mr.t.s.mohammed mohideen, standing counse for r4prayer: writ petition filed under article 226 of the constitution of india, praying this court to issue a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to consideration of the representation dated 18.08.2025 seeking for implementation of the order dated 21.05.2025 passed by the honble supreme court of india in civil appeal nos.10029 and 9964 of 2024 (arising out of slp (c) nos. 5866 and 8081 of 2024) along with review petition nos. 1313, 1314 and 1315 of 2024 in (in civil appeal nos. 831, 832 and 833 of 2023) within the time frame.order(order of the court was made by the hon'ble n.sathish kumar j.) learned counsel for the petitioner for the petitioner seeks to withdraw this writ petition. he has also made an endorsement to that effect.2. permission is granted. the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. no costs. (n.sathish kumar j.) (m.jothiraman j.) 25-06-2026 bala to

Full Judgment

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 25-06-2026

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE N. SATHISH KUMAR AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.JOTHIRAMAN WP(MD)No.17393 of 2026 J.Vanathi Petitioner(s) Vs. Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s): Mr.A.Nallathambi Raj For Respondent(s): Mr.M.S.Parthiban, Counsel for State for R1 to R3 Mr.T.S.Mohammed Mohideen, Standing Counse for R4

Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to consideration of the representation dated 18.08.2025 seeking for implementation of the order dated 21.05.2025 passed by the Honble Supreme Court of India in Civil Appeal Nos.10029 and 9964 of 2024 (arising out of SLP (C) Nos. 5866 and 8081 of 2024) along with Review Petition Nos. 1313, 1314 and 1315 of 2024 in (in Civil Appeal Nos. 831, 832 and 833 of 2023) within the time frame.

ORDER

(Order of the Court was made by the Hon'ble N.Sathish Kumar J.) Learned counsel for the petitioner for the petitioner seeks to withdraw this writ petition. He has also made an endorsement to that effect.

2. Permission is granted. The Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. (N.SATHISH KUMAR J.) (M.JOTHIRAMAN J.) 25-06-2026 bala To

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial