Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Anu B vs State of Kerala

ANU B vs State of Kerala

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Jul 30, 2021
~3 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1650195

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
WP(C)/13230/2021

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

ANU B

Respondent

State of Kerala

Excerpt

.....is prepared for selection of anganwadi workers. it is submitted that when no steps are being taken to make appointments, the petitioner has approached the 3 rd respondent with ext.p2 request which may be directed to be considered.4. the learned government pleader, on instructions from the3rd respondent, submits that there is a civil suit filed with regard to the selection and it is only because of orders passed in the said suit -: 3 :- that steps to make appointments from ext.p1 could not be completed in time. it is submitted that appropriate steps have been taken to contest the civil suit on the question of maintainability thereof and that steps shall be taken on ext.p2 as soon as possible in the circumstances. in the above view of the matter, there will be a direction to the 3rd respondent to take up, consider and pass orders on ext.p2 request made by the petitioner, taking note of the fact that the petitioner is included at serial no.1 in ext.p1 list. appropriate steps shall be taken as early as possible. this writ petition is ordered accordingly. sd/- anu sivaraman judge jvt/2.8.2021 -: 4 :- appendix of wp(c) 13230/2021 petitioner exhibits exhibit p1 a true copy of the rank list for anganwadi workers in thannithodu grama panchayath. exhibit p2 a true copy of the request dated 3.5.2021 before the 3rd respondent.

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN FRIDAY, THE 30TH DAY OF JULY 2021 / 8TH SRAVANA, 1943 PETITIONER :- ANU B, AGED 41 YEARS W/O.SANTHOSHKUMAR, KARAVELIMANNIL VEEDU, THEKKUTHODU P.O., THANNITHODU VILLAGE, KONNI TALUK, PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT. BY ADVS. K.V.ANIL KUMAR SWAPNA VIJAYAN RESPONDENTS :- 1 STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, DEPARTMENT OF WOMEN AND CHILD DEVELOPMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN-695 001. 2 THE DIRECTOR DIRECTORATE OF WOMEN AND CHILD DEVELOPMENT, POOJAPURA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN-695 033. 3 THE CHILD DEVELOPMENT PROJECT OFFICER CHILD DEVELOPMENT PROJECT OFFICE, KONNI, 4 THE ADDITIONAL CHILD DEVELOPMENT PROJECT OFFICER, ADDITIONAL CHILD DEVELOPMENT PROJECT OFFICE, KONNI, 5 THANNITHODU GRAMA PANCHAYATH, THANNITHODU P.O., PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT, PIN-689 699, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. SRI. BIJOY CHANDRAN -SR. G.P. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 30.07.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: -: 2 :-

JUDGMENT

Dated this the 30th day of July, 2021 This writ petition is filed seeking the following reliefs :-

“i) issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate order or directing the 3rd respondent to make appointment of Anganwadi workers from the Ext.P1 rank list in accordance with law immediately. ii) issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate order or directing the 3rd respondent to consider petitioner's Ext.P2 request and appoint her in any of the existing vacancies of Anganwadi workers from Ext.P1 rank list in accordance with law immediately.”

2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader.

3. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner

that the petitioner is included at serial No.1 in Ext.P1 ranked list which is prepared for selection of Anganwadi workers. It is submitted that when no steps are being taken to make appointments, the petitioner has approached the 3 rd respondent with Ext.P2 request which may be directed to be considered.

4. The learned Government Pleader, on instructions from the

3rd respondent, submits that there is a civil suit filed with regard to the selection and it is only because of orders passed in the said suit -: 3 :- that steps to make appointments from Ext.P1 could not be completed in time. It is submitted that appropriate steps have been taken to contest the civil suit on the question of maintainability thereof and that steps shall be taken on Ext.P2 as soon as possible in the circumstances. In the above view of the matter, there will be a direction to the 3rd respondent to take up, consider and pass orders on Ext.P2 request made by the petitioner, taking note of the fact that the petitioner is included at serial No.1 in Ext.P1 list. Appropriate steps shall be taken as early as possible. This writ petition is ordered accordingly. Sd/- ANU SIVARAMAN JUDGE Jvt/2.8.2021 -: 4 :- APPENDIX OF WP(C) 13230/2021 PETITIONER EXHIBITS Exhibit P1 A TRUE COPY OF THE RANK LIST FOR ANGANWADI WORKERS IN THANNITHODU GRAMA PANCHAYATH. Exhibit P2 A TRUE COPY OF THE REQUEST DATED 3.5.2021 BEFORE THE 3RD RESPONDENT.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial