Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Naresh G vs the State of Karnataka

Naresh G vs The State of Karnataka

Type Court Judgment Court Karnataka Orders Decided Oct 31, 2025
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1649186

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Karnataka Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
WP/3222/2024

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Naresh G

Respondent

The State of Karnataka

Excerpt

-1-in the high court of karnataka at bengalurudated this the 31st day of october, 2025 before the hon'ble mr. justice s sunil dutt yadav writ petition no. 3222 of 2024 (klr-res) between:1. naresh gs/o gopal d. age: 30 years occ: agrilculture labourer r/o h no 18, ii stage 4 th man 1st floor m s h layout anand nagar post near hebbal bangalore - 560 024 aadhar no.645250534984 pan no.bmipn6772r email id. [email protected] mobile no.95335508953 digitally signed by vijaya p … petitioner location: high court (by sri. abhirup paul bangara., advocate) of karnataka and:1. the state of karnataka represented by its principal secretary revenue department m s building vidhan veedhi bengaluru - 560 001 -2-2. the deputy commissioner3. the assistant commissioner4. the tahasildar bangalore (south) - 560 001 … respondents (by sri. shamanth naik, hcgp) this w.p. is filed under articles 226 and 227 of the constitution of india, praying to directing the respondent authorities to consider the petitioner's application / dated 06/12/2019 vide annexure-a and etc. this petition coming on for preliminary hearing this day, order was made therein as under: coram: hon'ble mr. justice s sunil dutt yadavoral orderlearned high court government pleader files a copy of the endorsement dated 13.05.2021 whereby the application of the petitioner has been rejected. -3-2. in light of the same, petition is disposed of as not calling for adjudication, reserving liberty to the petitioner to take appropriate action if so advised. sd/- (s sunil dutt yadav) judge vp

Full Judgment

-1-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 31ST DAY OF OCTOBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S SUNIL DUTT YADAV WRIT PETITION NO. 3222 OF 2024 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN:

1. NARESH G

S/O GOPAL D. AGE: 30 YEARS OCC: AGRILCULTURE LABOURER R/O H NO 18, II STAGE 4 TH MAN 1ST FLOOR M S H LAYOUT ANAND NAGAR POST NEAR HEBBAL BANGALORE - 560 024 AADHAR NO.645250534984 PAN NO.BMIPN6772R EMAIL ID. [email protected] MOBILE NO.95335508953 Digitally signed by VIJAYA P … PETITIONER Location: HIGH COURT (BY SRI. ABHIRUP PAUL BANGARA., ADVOCATE) OF KARNATAKA AND:

1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY REVENUE DEPARTMENT M S BUILDING VIDHAN VEEDHI BENGALURU - 560 001 -2-

2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER

3. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER

4. THE TAHASILDAR BANGALORE (SOUTH) - 560 001 … RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. SHAMANTH NAIK, HCGP) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO DIRECTING THE RESPONDENT AUTHORITIES TO CONSIDER THE PETITIONER'S APPLICATION / DATED 06/12/2019 VIDE ANNEXURE-A AND ETC. THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S SUNIL DUTT YADAV

ORAL ORDER

Learned High Court Government Pleader files a copy of the endorsement dated 13.05.2021 whereby the application of the petitioner has been rejected. -3-

2. In light of the same, petition is disposed of as not calling for adjudication, reserving liberty to the petitioner to take appropriate action if so advised. Sd/- (S SUNIL DUTT YADAV) JUDGE VP

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial