Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

E.M.Rasheed vs Shri.Thomas

E.M.Rasheed vs Shri.Thomas

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Orders Decided Oct 28, 2021
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1649082

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
RFA/481/2008

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

E.M.Rasheed

Respondent

Shri.Thomas

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr. justice p.somarajan thursday, the 28th day of october 2021 / 6th karthika, 1943 against the order/judgment in os 128/1993 of principal sub court,ernakulam, ernakulam appellant/additional second plaintiff: e.m.rasheed, riyas villa, c.c.19/2320,, nanbiapuram road, palluruthy, kochi-16. by advs. sri.g.p.shinod sri.manu v. respondents/defendants:1 shri.thomas, father superior, marthoma bhavanam, light vocation seminary, kaipadamugal,h.m.t. colony,kalamasserry p.o. 2 marthoma bhavanam, kaipadamugal, h.m.t. colony, kalamasserry p.o., represented by father suprior. 3 the mother superior, vocation seminary convent, marthoma bhavanam, kaipadamugal, hmt colony, kalamasserry p.o. by adv sri.a.k.jose this regular first appeal having come up for hearing on 28.10.2021, the court on the same day delivered the following:judgmentthe learned counsel for the appellant submitted that there is no instruction from the party concerned. the appeal is of the year 2008. the litigation started in the year1993. now twenty eight years elapsed. hence, the appeal will stand dismissed for non- prosecution. sd/- p.somarajan judge spv

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.SOMARAJAN THURSDAY, THE 28TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2021 / 6TH KARTHIKA, 1943 AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN OS 128/1993 OF PRINCIPAL SUB COURT,ERNAKULAM, ERNAKULAM APPELLANT/ADDITIONAL SECOND PLAINTIFF: E.M.RASHEED, RIYAS VILLA, C.C.19/2320,, NANBIAPURAM ROAD, PALLURUTHY, KOCHI-16. BY ADVS. SRI.G.P.SHINOD SRI.MANU V. RESPONDENTS/DEFENDANTS:

1 SHRI.THOMAS, FATHER SUPERIOR, MARTHOMA BHAVANAM, LIGHT VOCATION SEMINARY, KAIPADAMUGAL,H.M.T. COLONY,KALAMASSERRY P.O. 2 MARTHOMA BHAVANAM, KAIPADAMUGAL, H.M.T. COLONY, KALAMASSERRY P.O., REPRESENTED BY FATHER SUPRIOR. 3 THE MOTHER SUPERIOR, VOCATION SEMINARY CONVENT, MARTHOMA BHAVANAM, KAIPADAMUGAL, HMT COLONY, KALAMASSERRY P.O. BY ADV SRI.A.K.JOSE THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR HEARING ON 28.10.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

JUDGMENT

The learned counsel for the appellant submitted that there is no instruction from the party concerned. The appeal is of the year 2008. The litigation started in the year

1993. Now twenty eight years elapsed. Hence, the appeal will stand dismissed for non- prosecution. Sd/- P.SOMARAJAN JUDGE SPV

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial