K R Anand vs the Divisional Controller

K R Anand vs The Divisional Controller

Type Court Judgment Court Karnataka Orders Decided Apr 28, 2025

~3 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1648625

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1648625
Court: Karnataka Orders High Court
Judge: Lok Adalath
Decided On: Apr 28, 2025
Case Number: WP/9300/2021

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

K R Anand

Respondent

The Divisional Controller

Excerpt

.....prayer for and to directing the respondent corporation to reinstate the petitioner and to pay all consequential benefits including full back wages this writ petition coming on for conciliation before national lok adalat, the following concialiation order is passed:conciliation orderin this petition, the petitioner has prayed for quashing the award dated 19.01.2019 passed by the presiding officer, iii additional labour court, bengaluru in id no.11/2018 vide annexure-a.2. after negotiations, the parties have arrived at settlement. both the parties have filed a joint memo duly signed before the lok adalath. the said joint memo reads as follows:1. the respondent 3 corporation will considered the date of dismissal as compulsory retirement.2. petitioner is entitled for el in his account as on date of dismissal.3. petitioner is entitled for pass issued for retired employees.3. accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of interms of the joint memo modifying the award dated 19.01.2019 passed by the presiding officer, iii additional labour court, bengaluru in id no.11/2018 vide annexure-a. judge member nv filed before lokadalat high court legal services committee, bengaluru before the high court lok adalat wp. no. 9300/2021 (lok adalath no. 4735/2025) k r anand ... petitioner the divisional controller ... respondent joint memo the wp filed against the award in id no. 11/2018 dated 19/01/2019 on the file of the iiird additional labour court, bengaluru has been settled between the parties at the intervention of bench on the specific stipulation that this settlement will not be taken as a precedent on the following terms and the award be modified as under:1. the respondent 3 corporation will considered the date of dismissal as compulsory retirement.2. petitioner is entitled for el in his account as on date of dismissal.3. petitioner is entitled for pass issued for retired employees.the parties to this petition have set their hands to this settlement before the lok adalat in.....

Full Judgment

HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMMITTEE, BENGALURU BEFORE THE NATIONAL LOK ADALAT
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF APRIL, 2025 CONCILIATORS PRESENT: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B M SHYAM PRASAD & SRI. B.S. PRASAD, MEMBER W.P. No.9300/2021 (Lok Adalat No.4735/2025) 1 . K.R. ANAND S/O RAMU AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS R/AT KODIPALYA, KENGERI VIDYAPEETA POST BENGALURU - 560 060 ...PETITIONER (BY SRI. SHANKAR L., ADVOCATE) 1 . THE DIVISIONAL CONTROLLER B.M.T.C.CENTRAL OFFICES (VOLVO) K.H. ROAD, BENGALURU-560 027. &RESPONDENT (BY SMT. RENUKA H.R., ADVOCATE) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226
AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASHING THE IMPUGNED AWARD DATED 19.01.2019 AS PER ANENXURE-A PASSED BY THE LEARNED PRESIDING OFFICER, III ADDL. LABOUR COURT, BENGALURU IN ID NO.11/2018 CONSEQUENTLY ALLOWED THE DISPUTE AS PRAYER FOR AND TO DIRECTING THE RESPONDENT CORPORATION TO REINSTATE THE PETITIONER AND TO PAY ALL CONSEQUENTIAL BENEFITS INCLUDING FULL BACK WAGES THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR CONCILIATION BEFORE NATIONAL LOK ADALAT, THE FOLLOWING CONCIALIATION ORDER IS PASSED:

CONCILIATION ORDER

In this petition, the petitioner has prayed for quashing the Award dated 19.01.2019 passed by the Presiding Officer, III Additional Labour Court, Bengaluru in ID No.11/2018 vide Annexure-A.

2. After negotiations, the parties have arrived at settlement. Both the parties have filed a Joint Memo duly signed before the Lok Adalath. The said Joint Memo reads as follows:

1. The Respondent 3 Corporation will considered the date of dismissal as compulsory retirement.

2. Petitioner is entitled for EL in his account as on date of dismissal.

3. Petitioner is entitled for pass issued for retired employees.

3. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is disposed of in

terms of the Joint Memo modifying the Award dated 19.01.2019 passed by the Presiding Officer, III Additional Labour Court, Bengaluru in ID No.11/2018 vide Annexure-A. JUDGE MEMBER nv FILED BEFORE LOKADALAT HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMMITTEE, BENGALURU BEFORE THE HIGH COURT LOK ADALAT WP. NO. 9300/2021 (LOK ADALATH NO. 4735/2025) K R ANAND ... Petitioner THE DIVISIONAL CONTROLLER ... Respondent JOINT MEMO The WP filed against the award in ID No. 11/2018 Dated 19/01/2019 on the file of the IIIrd Additional Labour court, Bengaluru has been settled between the parties at the intervention of Bench on the specific stipulation that this settlement will not be taken as a precedent on the following terms and the award be modified as under: