Kuriyan vs Ouseph

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Orders Decided Aug 09, 2021

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1646102

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1646102
Court: Kerala Orders High Court
Judge: Honourable Mr.Justice V.G.Arun
Decided On: Aug 09, 2021
Case Number: OP(C)/142/2016

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Kuriyan

Respondent

Ouseph

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr.justice v.g.arun monday, the 9th day of august 2021 / 18th sravana, 1943 against the order/judgment in os 2500/2011 of munsiff court, irinjalakuda, thrissur petitioner/s/plaintiff: kuriyan aged 64 years s/o.thekiniyath anthony, edakulam desom, poomangalam village, mukundapuram taluk. by adv sri.g.sreekumar (chelur) respondent/s/respondent: 1 ouseph aged 66 years s/o.kummathuparambil anthony, edakulam desom, poomangalam 2 jojo aged 41 years s/o.kummathuparambil rappai, edakulam desom, poomangalam3 kerala state electricity board rep. by secretary, k s e b, vydhuthi bhavan, thiruvananthapuram.695 001. 4 kerala state electricity board rep. by deputy chief engineer, kerala state electricity circle, near prabhath theater, irinjalakuda.680 001. 5 anthony johny s/o.rappai, kunnathuparambil house, edakulam desom, poomangalam village, mukundapuram taluk.680 001. r1, r2 and r5 by adv sri.t.n.manoj r3 and r4 by adv. sajeev kumar.k this op (civil) having come up for admission on 09.08.2021, the court on the same day delivered the following:judgmentlearned counsel for the petitioner submits that, despite sending registered notice to the petitioner, there is no response from his part. therefore, it has to be presumed that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting this original petition. hence, the original petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. sd/- v.g.arun judge rk

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.G.ARUN MONDAY, THE 9TH DAY OF AUGUST 2021 / 18TH SRAVANA, 1943 AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN OS 2500/2011 OF MUNSIFF COURT, IRINJALAKUDA, THRISSUR PETITIONER/S/PLAINTIFF: KURIYAN AGED 64 YEARS S/O.THEKINIYATH ANTHONY, EDAKULAM DESOM, POOMANGALAM VILLAGE, MUKUNDAPURAM TALUK. BY ADV SRI.G.SREEKUMAR (CHELUR) RESPONDENT/S/RESPONDENT: 1 OUSEPH AGED 66 YEARS S/O.KUMMATHUPARAMBIL ANTHONY, EDAKULAM DESOM, POOMANGALAM 2 JOJO AGED 41 YEARS S/O.KUMMATHUPARAMBIL RAPPAI, EDAKULAM DESOM, POOMANGALAM
3 KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD REP. BY SECRETARY, K S E B, VYDHUTHI BHAVAN, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.695 001. 4 KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD REP. BY DEPUTY CHIEF ENGINEER, KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY CIRCLE, NEAR PRABHATH THEATER, IRINJALAKUDA.680 001. 5 ANTHONY JOHNY S/O.RAPPAI, KUNNATHUPARAMBIL HOUSE, EDAKULAM DESOM, POOMANGALAM VILLAGE, MUKUNDAPURAM TALUK.680 001. R1, R2 and R5 BY ADV SRI.T.N.MANOJ R3 AND R4 BY ADV. SAJEEV KUMAR.K THIS OP (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 09.08.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

JUDGMENT

Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that, despite sending registered notice to the petitioner, there is no response from his part. Therefore, it has to be presumed that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting this original petition. Hence, the original petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- V.G.ARUN JUDGE RK

Same Court & Year Kerala Orders · 2021 Same Parties Kuriyan vs Ouseph Same Judge Honourable Mr.Justice V.G.Arun