V.Naveen Kumar Vs The Branch Manager

V.Naveen Kumar vs The Branch Manager

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Decided Feb 27, 2026

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1644108

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1644108
Court: Chennai High Court
Judge: Honourable Mr Justice R.Vijayakumar
Decided On: Feb 27, 2026
Case Number: WP(MD)/16713/2025

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

V.Naveen Kumar

Respondent

The Branch Manager

Excerpt

before the madurai bench of madras high court dated: 27.02.2026coramthe hon'ble mr.justice r.vijayakumar and w.m.p(md)nos.12681 & 12682 of 2025 v.naveen kumar ...petitioner vs1. the branch manager, chinnalapatti branch, dindigul district.2. the branch manager, gandhigram rural institute branch, dindigul district. ... respondentsprayer: writ petition is filed under article 226 of the constitution of india, to issue a writ of certiorarified mandamus calling for the records relating to the impugned auction notices issued by the respondents herein vide their notices dated 06.06.2025, quash the same and further direct the respondents herein to return the petitioner's jewel by collecting the entire loan amount along with the applicable interest by considering the petitioner's representation dated 17.06.2025.for petitioner : m/s.t.cibichakraborthy for respondents : mr.v.balasubramanian standing counsel *****orderthe present writ petition has been filed seeking to quash the auction notice issued by the respondents on 06.06.2025 to bring the jewels for auction on the ground of default.2. pending writ petition, the petitioner has cleared the jewel loan and jewels have been returned to the petitioner.3. the petitioner has repledged the jewels in a different bank and he hasalso cleared 90% of the od account. in such circumstances, the prayer sought for in the writ petition has already been considered by the authorities. therefore, no further orders are called for in the writ petition. the petitioner is at liberty to approach the bank for any ots settlement, it is for them to consider the same under the relevant scheme.4. with the above said observations, this writ petition stands disposed of. no costs. consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are also closed. ncc : yes/no index : yes/no internet: yes/no rjrr.vijayakumar, j.rjr

Full Judgment

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 27.02.2026
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR and W.M.P(MD)Nos.12681 & 12682 of 2025 V.Naveen Kumar ...Petitioner Vs
1. The Branch Manager, Chinnalapatti Branch, Dindigul District.
2. The Branch Manager, Gandhigram Rural Institute Branch, Dindigul District. ... Respondents
PRAYER: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records relating to the impugned auction notices issued by the respondents herein vide their notices dated 06.06.2025, quash the same and further direct the respondents herein to return the petitioner's jewel by collecting the entire loan amount along with the applicable interest by considering the petitioner's representation dated 17.06.2025.
For Petitioner : M/s.T.Cibichakraborthy For Respondents : Mr.V.Balasubramanian Standing Counsel *****

ORDER

The present writ petition has been filed seeking to quash the auction notice issued by the respondents on 06.06.2025 to bring the jewels for auction on the ground of default.

2. Pending writ petition, the petitioner has cleared the jewel loan and jewels have been returned to the petitioner.

3. The petitioner has repledged the jewels in a different Bank and he has

also cleared 90% of the OD account. In such circumstances, the prayer sought for in the writ petition has already been considered by the authorities. Therefore, no further orders are called for in the writ petition. The petitioner is at liberty to approach the Bank for any OTS settlement, it is for them to consider the same under the relevant scheme.

4. With the above said observations, this writ petition stands disposed of. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are also closed. NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes/No Internet: Yes/No RJR

R.VIJAYAKUMAR, J.

RJR

Same Court & Year Chennai · 2026 Same Parties V.Naveen Kumar vs The Branch Manager Same Judge Honourable Mr Justice R.Vijayakumar