Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Sasikumar Vs The State Of Tamilnadu, Rep. By The Inspector Of Police,

Sasikumar vs The State Of Tamilnadu, Rep. By The Inspector Of Police,

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Orders Decided Jun 23, 2026
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1643339

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
CRL MP(MD)/11306/2026

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Sasikumar

Respondent

The State Of Tamilnadu, Rep. By The Inspector Of Police,

Excerpt

.....: mr.p.vetrivel government advocate(criminal side) prayer: to relax the condition imposed in crl.o.p.(md).no.18988 of 2025 dated 24.11.2025 passed by this court by directing the petitioners to report daily before the respondent police at 10.30 am., until further orders.orderthis criminal miscellaneous petition is filed to relax the condition imposed by this court in crl.o.p.(md).no.18988 of 2025 dated 24.11.2025.2.today (23.06.2026), when the matter was taken up for consideration, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has been complying with the condition without fail. however, the concerned police officials refused to obtain the petitioner’s signature and did not permit him to sign in the register. in this regard, an affidavit has been filed. the learned counsel further submitted that, with a view to file a petition for cancellation of bail, the respondent police deliberately restrained the petitioner from complying with the condition imposed by this court and thereafter filed a petition seeking cancellation of bail.3.this court considered the rival submissions made by the learned counsel appearing on either side and perused the materials available on record and the affidavit filed by the learned counsel for the petitioner.4.today, mr.c.antokivin, sub-inspector of police, appeared before this court and denied the allegations levelled against the respondent police. in view of the allegations made against the police officials, this court is inclined to modify the condition imposed on the petitioner to the effect that the petitioner shall report before the concerned jurisdictional magistrate court once in a week, i.e., on every monday at 10.30 a.m., for aperiod of four weeks.5. accordingly, this criminal miscellaneous petition is ordered. 23-06-2026 sbn to 1.the inspector of police,2. the additional public prosecutor, madurai bench of madras high court, madurai. p.dhanabal.j, sbn and 23.06.2026

Full Judgment

CRL MP(MD) NO. 11306 of 2026 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) DATED: 23-06-2026

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.DHANABAL and 1.Sasikumar 2.Shoba Sasikumar Petitioners Vs The State Of Tamilnadu Rep By The Inspector Of Police, (Cr.No.643 of 2025) Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr.V.Sukumar For Respondent(s) : Mr.P.Vetrivel Government Advocate(Criminal Side) Prayer: To relax the condition imposed in Crl.O.P.(MD).No.18988 of 2025 dated 24.11.2025 passed by this Court by directing the petitioners to report daily before the respondent police at 10.30 am., until further orders.

ORDER

This Criminal Miscellaneous Petition is filed to relax the condition imposed by this Court in Crl.O.P.(MD).No.18988 of 2025 dated 24.11.2025.

2.Today (23.06.2026), when the matter was taken up for consideration, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has been complying with the condition without fail. However, the concerned police officials refused to obtain the petitioner’s signature and did not permit him to sign in the register. In this regard, an affidavit has been filed. The learned counsel further submitted that, with a view to file a petition for cancellation of bail, the respondent police deliberately restrained the petitioner from complying with the condition imposed by this Court and thereafter filed a petition seeking cancellation of bail.

3.This Court considered the rival submissions made by the learned counsel appearing on either side and perused the materials available on record and the affidavit filed by the learned counsel for the petitioner.

4.Today, Mr.C.Antokivin, Sub-Inspector of Police, appeared before this Court and denied the allegations levelled against the respondent police. In view of the allegations made against the police officials, this Court is inclined to modify the condition imposed on the petitioner to the effect that the petitioner shall report before the concerned Jurisdictional Magistrate Court once in a week, i.e., on every Monday at 10.30 a.m., for a

period of four weeks.

5. Accordingly, this Criminal Miscellaneous Petition is ordered. 23-06-2026 sbn To 1.The Inspector Of Police,

2. The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. P.DHANABAL.J, sbn and 23.06.2026

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial