Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Aruna B @ Aruna vs D Vali

Aruna B @ Aruna vs D VALI

Type Court Judgment Court Karnataka Orders Decided Jul 29, 2025
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1642550

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Karnataka Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
MFA/120/2025

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Aruna B @ Aruna

Respondent

D VALI

Excerpt

-1-in the high court of karnataka at bengalurudated this the 29th day of july, 2025 before the hon'ble dr. justice chillakur sumalatha miscellaneous first appeal no.120 of 2025 (mv-d) between:1. aruna b. @ aruna, d/o late chikkaeerachannappa @ chikka, veerachannappa @ b veerejinppa, aged about 41 years,2. ashok @ b. ashok kumar,s/o. late chikkaeerachannaappa @ chikka veerachannappa @ b. veerachannappa, aged about 34 years, both are appellants are residing at sira gate, madhugiri road, tumakuru - 572 106. …appellants digitally signed by aaseefa (by sri. shantharaj k., advocate (absent)) parveen location: high and: court of karnataka 1. d. vali, s/o. d. hussen peera, aged about 45 years, residing at kambadur village and mandal, andhra pradesh state - 515 765.2. the oriental ins. co. ltd.,by its manager, no.7 vihamar, gandhi salai, 2nd floor rosy towers, -2- chennai - 600 034. tamil nadu state. …respondents this mfa filed u/s 173(1) of mv act against thejudgment and award dated 24.04.2024 passed inmvc no. 549/2008 on the file of the principal senior civil judge and cjm, tumakuru, partly allowing the claim petition for compensation and seeking enhancement of compensation. this appeal, coming on for orders, this day,judgment was delivered therein as under:coram: hon'ble dr. justice chillakur sumalathaoral judgmentno representation on appellants' side on call. the appeal was filed in the month of january, 2025 and till now, office objections are not complied. also there is no representation. therefore, the appeal stands dismissed for non- compliance of office objections. sd/- (dr.chillakur sumalatha) judge ns ct:tsm list no.: 1 sl no.: 39

Full Judgment

-1-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 29TH DAY OF JULY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.120 OF 2025 (MV-D) BETWEEN:

1. ARUNA B. @ ARUNA, D/O LATE CHIKKAEERACHANNAPPA @ CHIKKA, VEERACHANNAPPA @ B VEEREJINPPA, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS,

2. ASHOK @ B. ASHOK KUMAR,

S/O. LATE CHIKKAEERACHANNAAPPA @ CHIKKA VEERACHANNAPPA @ B. VEERACHANNAPPA, AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, BOTH ARE APPELLANTS ARE RESIDING AT SIRA GATE, MADHUGIRI ROAD, TUMAKURU - 572 106. …APPELLANTS Digitally signed by AASEEFA (BY SRI. SHANTHARAJ K., ADVOCATE (ABSENT)) PARVEEN Location: HIGH AND: COURT OF KARNATAKA 1. D. VALI, S/O. D. HUSSEN PEERA, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, RESIDING AT KAMBADUR VILLAGE AND MANDAL, ANDHRA PRADESH STATE - 515 765.

2. THE ORIENTAL INS. CO. LTD.,

BY ITS MANAGER, NO.7 VIHAMAR, GANDHI SALAI, 2ND FLOOR ROSY TOWERS, -2- CHENNAI - 600 034. TAMIL NADU STATE. …RESPONDENTS THIS MFA FILED U/S 173(1) OF MV ACT AGAINST THE

JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 24.04.2024 PASSED IN

MVC NO. 549/2008 ON THE FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM, TUMAKURU, PARTLY ALLOWING THE CLAIM PETITION FOR COMPENSATION AND SEEKING ENHANCEMENT OF COMPENSATION. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,

JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM: HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA

ORAL JUDGMENT

No representation on appellants' side on call. The appeal was filed in the month of January, 2025 and till now, office objections are not complied. Also there is no representation. Therefore, the appeal stands dismissed for non- compliance of office objections. Sd/- (DR.CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA) JUDGE NS CT:TSM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 39

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial