Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Joseph vs George

Joseph vs George

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Orders Decided Apr 07, 2021
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1642462

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
RSA/1178/2005

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Joseph

Respondent

George

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr.justice n.anil kumar wednesday, the 07th day of april 2021 / 17th chaithra, as 276/2005 & 283/2005 of district court, ernakulam os 79/1998 of munsiff court, muvattupuzha appellants/appellants in as 276/2005 & respondents in as1 joseph, s/o kuriakose, chathanikkattu, pampakuda kara, onakoor village. 2 robins, s/o joseph in do. do. 3 roby, s/o do. in do. do. 4 kunjamma, w/o.joseph in do. do. 5 yohannan, s/o kuriakose in do. do. 6 mary, w/o kuriakose in do. do. 7 mathew, s/o kunju kanjiramattathil house, pampakuda kara,, in do. do. 8 kunjumon, s/o mathew in do. do.9 saju, s/o do. in do. do. ..2.. 10 aleyamma, w/o mathew in do. do. by advs. sri.s.v.balakrishna iyer (sr.) sri.k.jayakumar (sr.) sri.p.b.krishnan respondents/respondents in as 276/2005 & appellants in 1 george pampakuda kara, onakkur village. 2 annamma wo.varghese in do. do. r1 by adv. sri.k.k.chandran pillai r1 by adv. sri.s.k.mohamed sajeer this regular second appeal having been finally heard on 07.04.2021, the court on the same day delivered the following: ..3..judgmentthis regular second appeal is not pressed (vide separate memo). the memo is recorded. in the result, the regular second appeal stands dismissed as not pressed. there would be no order as to costs. pending applications, if any, stand closed. sd/- n.anil kumar judge bka/07.04.2021

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANIL KUMAR WEDNESDAY, THE 07TH DAY OF APRIL 2021 / 17TH CHAITHRA, AS 276/2005 & 283/2005 OF DISTRICT COURT, ERNAKULAM OS 79/1998 OF MUNSIFF COURT, MUVATTUPUZHA APPELLANTS/APPELLANTS IN AS 276/2005 & RESPONDENTS IN AS

1 JOSEPH, S/O KURIAKOSE, CHATHANIKKATTU, PAMPAKUDA KARA, ONAKOOR VILLAGE. 2 ROBINS, S/O JOSEPH IN DO. DO. 3 ROBY, S/O DO. IN DO. DO. 4 KUNJAMMA, W/O.JOSEPH IN DO. DO. 5 YOHANNAN, S/O KURIAKOSE IN DO. DO. 6 MARY, W/O KURIAKOSE IN DO. DO. 7 MATHEW, S/O KUNJU KANJIRAMATTATHIL HOUSE, PAMPAKUDA KARA,, IN DO. DO. 8 KUNJUMON, S/O MATHEW IN DO. DO.

9 SAJU, S/O DO. IN DO. DO. ..2.. 10 ALEYAMMA, W/O MATHEW IN DO. DO. BY ADVS. SRI.S.V.BALAKRISHNA IYER (SR.) SRI.K.JAYAKUMAR (SR.) SRI.P.B.KRISHNAN RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS IN AS 276/2005 & APPELLANTS IN 1 GEORGE PAMPAKUDA KARA, ONAKKUR VILLAGE. 2 ANNAMMA WO.VARGHESE IN DO. DO. R1 BY ADV. SRI.K.K.CHANDRAN PILLAI R1 BY ADV. SRI.S.K.MOHAMED SAJEER THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 07.04.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ..3..

JUDGMENT

This Regular Second Appeal is not pressed (vide separate memo). The memo is recorded. In the result, the Regular Second Appeal stands dismissed as not pressed. There would be no order as to costs. Pending applications, if any, stand closed. Sd/- N.ANIL KUMAR JUDGE Bka/07.04.2021

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial