Shaikh Fareed and Ors vs the State and Anr

Shaikh Fareed and Ors vs The State and Anr

Type Court Judgment Court Karnataka Orders Decided Jul 01, 2025

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1641102

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1641102
Court: Karnataka Orders High Court
Judge: V Srishananda
Decided On: Jul 01, 2025
Case Number: CRL.P/201690/2024

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Shaikh Fareed and Ors

Respondent

The State and Anr

Excerpt

.....avinash a. uplaonkar, advocate for r2) this crl.p is filed under section 528 of bnss,praying to, i) quash the fir in crime no. 121/2024 dated 30.09.2024 registered by the reghavendranagar police station and written information dated 30.09.2024 lodged by the respondent no. 2 against the petitioner who are accused no. 02 accused no. 3 and 115(2), 118(1), 109, 352, 351(1), 85, 74, 3(5), of bnss 2023 vide annexure-a and annexure-b. ii) quash the entire proceedings in crime no.121/2024 against the petitioners who are accused no. 2, accused no. 3 and 115(2), 118(1), 109, 352, 351(1), 85, 74, 3(5) of bnss 2023 vide annexure-c iii) grant such other order/s asthis hon’ble court deems fit to grant in the factsand circumstances of the case. this petition coming on for admission, this day,order was made therein as under:coram: hon'ble mr. justice v srishanandaoral order(per: hon'ble mr. justice v srishananda) learned counsel for the petitioners files a memo. -3- memo reds as under: “in the above case, i filed petition under section 482 of cr.p.c., which is not maintainable in law. hence, it is prayed before hon’ble court kindly permit to me for withdraw the petition with liberty to file fresh petition in the interest of justice. hence, the memo.” placing the memo on record, criminal petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty as prayed for. in view of disposal of the main petition, pending application, if any, does not survive for consideration. sd/- (v srishananda) judge srt list no.: 1 sl no.: 28 ct:pk

Full Judgment

-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, KALABURAGI BENCH DATED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF JULY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA CRIMINAL PETITION NO.201690 OF 2024 (482(Cr.PC)/528(BNSS)) BETWEEN:
1. SHAIKH FAREED S/O RASOOL, AGE ABOUT 28 YEARS, OCC: PRIVATE JOB.
2. KAUSAR PARVEEN W/O RASOOL, AGE ABOUT 50 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD, BOTH R/O. CHITTEWADI, NEAR BOYS HOSTEL, BIDAR-585301.
3. ZOHARA FATIMA,

AGE:34 YEARS, OCC:HOUSEHOLD, ALL R/O. CHITTEWADI, Digitally signed by SUMITRA NEAR BOYS HOSTEL, SHERIGAR BIDAR-585301. Location: HIGH COURT OF …PETITIONERS KARNATAKA (BY SRI GURURAJ GOPALRAO AND SRI A.A. GUNNAPUR, ADVOCATES) AND:

1. THE STATE THROUGH RAGHAVENDRA PS, RAGHAVENDRA NAGAR POLICE STATION, KALABURAGI - 585103, R/P BY ADDITIONAL PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, KALABURAGI.

2. SMT. AMEENA W/O SHAIKH SAYED,

AGE:29 YEARS, OCC: FDA RTO DEPARTMENT, -2- R/O. CHITTEWADI BIDAR, PREVIOUSLY BOMANNAHALLI, BANGALORE NOW R/O. EQBAL COLONY, KALABURAGI-585101. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI VEERANAGOUDA MALIPATIL, HCGP FOR R1; SRI AVINASH A. UPLAONKAR, ADVOCATE FOR R2) THIS CRL.P IS FILED UNDER SECTION 528 OF BNSS,

PRAYING TO, I) QUASH THE FIR IN CRIME NO. 121/2024 DATED 30.09.2024 REGISTERED BY THE REGHAVENDRANAGAR POLICE STATION AND WRITTEN INFORMATION DATED 30.09.2024 LODGED BY THE RESPONDENT NO. 2 AGAINST THE PETITIONER WHO ARE ACCUSED NO. 02 ACCUSED NO. 3 AND 115(2), 118(1), 109, 352, 351(1), 85, 74, 3(5), OF BNSS 2023 VIDE ANNEXURE-A AND ANNEXURE-B. II) QUASH THE ENTIRE PROCEEDINGS IN CRIME NO.121/2024 AGAINST THE PETITIONERS WHO ARE ACCUSED NO. 2, ACCUSED NO. 3 AND 115(2), 118(1), 109, 352, 351(1), 85, 74, 3(5) OF BNSS 2023 VIDE ANNEXURE-C III) GRANT SUCH OTHER ORDER/S AS

THIS HON’BLE COURT DEEMS FIT TO GRANT IN THE FACTS

AND CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE. THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY,

ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA

ORAL ORDER

(PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA) Learned counsel for the petitioners files a memo. -3- Memo reds as under: “In the above case, I filed petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., which is not maintainable in law. Hence, it is prayed before Hon’ble Court kindly permit to me for withdraw the petition with liberty to file fresh petition in the interest of justice. Hence, the memo.” Placing the memo on record, criminal petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty as prayed for. In view of disposal of the main petition, pending application, if any, does not survive for consideration. Sd/- (V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE SRT List No.: 1 Sl No.: 28 CT:PK

Same Court & Year Karnataka Orders · 2025 Same Parties Shaikh Fareed and Ors vs The State and Anr Same Judge V Srishananda