C Vinodkumar vs the State of Karnataka

C Vinodkumar vs The State of Karnataka

Type Court Judgment Court Karnataka Orders Decided Jul 02, 2025

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1640665

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1640665
Court: Karnataka Orders High Court
Judge: V Srishananda
Decided On: Jul 02, 2025
Case Number: CRL.P/201682/2023

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

C Vinodkumar

Respondent

The State of Karnataka

Excerpt

.....prosecutor, high court of karnataka, kalaburagi-585102.2. smt. ushafood sirestedar, -2- tahasil office, aland, kalaburagi. …respondent (by sri. veeranagouda malipatil, hcgp for r1) this crl.p is filed u/s. 482 of cr.p.c. (old), u/sec. 528 of bnss (new), praying to allow the present criminal petition and also quash the entire proceedings in fir no. 44/2022 and charge sheet filed which was registered at aland police station,kalaburagi district against petitioner no.1 c.vinodkumar s/o shivaramegouda, and petitioner no.2 bhimabhai s/o bijilbhai sindhal, for the offence punishable u/sec. 3, 6 and 7 of the essential commodities act 1955 in the interest of justice and equity. the said case trialed at prl. cj (jd) and jmfc aland in cc no. 8286/2022 of kalaburagi dist.this petition, coming on for admission, this day,order was made therein as under:coram: hon'ble mr. justice v srishanandaoral order(per: hon'ble mr. justice v srishananda) learned counsel for the petitioners has filed a memo, which reads as under: “in the above case the filed petition is not maintainable. hence i want to withdraw the petition. it is prayed before hon’ble court kindly permit to withdraw the petition with liberty to file petition in the interest of justice.” -3-2. placing the memo on record, petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. sd/- (v srishananda) judge kcm list no.: 1 sl no.: 26 ct:pk

Full Judgment

-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, KALABURAGI BENCH DATED THIS THE 02ND DAY OF JULY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA CRIMINAL PETITION No.201682 OF 2023 (482(Cr.PC)/528(BNSS)) BETWEEN:
1. C. VINODKUMAR S/O SHIVARMEGOUDA, AGE:41 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS, OWNER OF HANUMAN TRADERS, R/O. 1-4, BANDAWADIPALLI, MEHABOOBNAGAR, TELANGANA STATE.
2. BHEEMABAI S/O BIJULBHAI SINDHAL,

AGE:38 YEARS, OCC: DRIVER, R/O. KOTTAD, TQ. KUTTIYAN, DIST. POR BANDAR GUJRAT STATE. Digitally signed …PETITIONERS by RENUKA Location: HIGH (BY SRI. AMEERAHAMAJA COURT OF KARNATAKA ABDULKADAR GUNNAPURA, ADVOCATE) AND:

1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA THROUGH, ALAND POLICE STATION, REPRESENTED BY, THE ADDL. STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, KALABURAGI-585102.

2. SMT. USHA

FOOD SIRESTEDAR, -2- TAHASIL OFFICE, ALAND, KALABURAGI. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. VEERANAGOUDA MALIPATIL, HCGP FOR R1) THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S. 482 OF CR.P.C. (OLD), U/SEC. 528 OF BNSS (NEW), PRAYING TO ALLOW THE PRESENT CRIMINAL PETITION AND ALSO QUASH THE ENTIRE PROCEEDINGS IN FIR NO. 44/2022 AND CHARGE SHEET FILED WHICH WAS REGISTERED AT ALAND POLICE STATION,

KALABURAGI DISTRICT AGAINST PETITIONER NO.1 C.VINODKUMAR S/O SHIVARAMEGOUDA, AND PETITIONER NO.2 BHIMABHAI S/O BIJILBHAI SINDHAL, FOR THE OFFENCE PUNISHABLE U/SEC. 3, 6 AND 7 OF THE ESSENTIAL COMMODITIES ACT 1955 IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY. THE SAID CASE TRIALED AT PRL. CJ (JD) AND JMFC ALAND IN CC NO. 8286/2022 OF KALABURAGI DIST.

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY,

ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA

ORAL ORDER

(PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA) Learned counsel for the petitioners has filed a memo, which reads as under: “In the above case the filed petition is not maintainable. Hence I want to withdraw the petition. It is prayed before Hon’ble Court kindly permit to withdraw the petition with liberty to file petition in the interest of justice.” -3-

2. Placing the memo on record, petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. Sd/- (V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE kcm List No.: 1 Sl No.: 26 CT:PK

Same Court & Year Karnataka Orders · 2025 Same Parties C Vinodkumar vs The State of Karnataka Same Judge V Srishananda