Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Shaju vs State of Kerala

SHAJU vs State of Kerala

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Jul 29, 2021
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1640448

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Bail Appl./4074/2021

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

SHAJU

Respondent

State of Kerala

Excerpt

.....the learned public prosecutor has submitted that 2.5 litres ofarrack and 50 litres of wash were seized from the possession of the petitioner, but he could not be arrested. any how, he does not have criminal antecedents to his credit.4. the contrabands have already been seized under a mahazar.in the nature of the allegations, his custodial interrogation is not necessary. he has no criminal antecedents to his credit. moreover, offence under sections 8(2) and 55(g) of the abkari act do not prescribe any statutory minimum substantive sentence and hence, theembargo under section 41a of the abkari act is not attracted. therefore, the petitioner is at liberty to surrender before the investigating officer within ten days from today and make himself available for interrogation. in the event of arrest, he shall be released on bail on executing bond for rs.50,000/-(rupees fifty thousand only) with two solvent sureties each for the like sum to the satisfaction of the investigating officer; shall co-operate with the investigation, shall not try to contact or influence the witnesses or tamper with the evidence and shall not involve in any crime during the period on bail. bail application is allowed as above. sd/- k.haripal judge jms/29.07 //true copy// p.a to judge

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.HARIPAL THURSDAY, THE 29TH DAY OF JULY 2021 / 7TH SRAVANA, 1943 BAIL APPL. NO. 4074 OF 2021 IN CRIME NO.46/2021 OF THANKAMANY EXCISE RANGE, IDUKKI. PETITIONER/ACCUSED: SHAJU AGED 40 YEARS S/O. THOMAS, NJARAKAL HOUSE, IDUKKI THALUK, IDUKKI VILLAGE, IDUKKI DISTRICT 685 602 BY ADV BINU PAUL (K/332/2005)-12479 RESPONDENTS/STATE & COMPLAINANT: STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, KOCHI 682 031 BY.ADV.PP.SMT.SREEJA V THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 29.07.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

ORDER

The petitioner is the sole accused in Crime No.46/2021 of Thankamany Excise Range in Idukki district, which was registered alleging offence punishable under Sections 8(2) and 55(g) of the Abkari Act, after seizing arrack and wash from the residence of the petitioner.

2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he has no criminal antecedents to his credit, that he is a widower; he has to look after his minor girl child and is prepared to co-operate with the investigation.

3. The learned Public Prosecutor has submitted that 2.5 litres of

arrack and 50 litres of wash were seized from the possession of the petitioner, but he could not be arrested. Any how, he does not have criminal antecedents to his credit.

4. The contrabands have already been seized under a mahazar.

In the nature of the allegations, his custodial interrogation is not necessary. He has no criminal antecedents to his credit. Moreover, Offence under Sections 8(2) and 55(g) of the Abkari Act do not prescribe any statutory minimum substantive sentence and hence, the

embargo under Section 41A of the Abkari Act is not attracted. Therefore, the petitioner is at liberty to surrender before the Investigating Officer within ten days from today and make himself available for interrogation. In the event of arrest, he shall be released on bail on executing bond for Rs.50,000/-(Rupees Fifty thousand only) with two solvent sureties each for the like sum to the satisfaction of the Investigating Officer; shall co-operate with the investigation, shall not try to contact or influence the witnesses or tamper with the evidence and shall not involve in any crime during the period on bail. Bail application is allowed as above. Sd/- K.HARIPAL JUDGE Jms/29.07 //True Copy// P.A to Judge

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial