Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Vijesh vs State of Kerala

Vijesh vs State of Kerala

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Orders Decided Jul 29, 2021
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1640238

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Bail Appl./4005/2021

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Vijesh

Respondent

State of Kerala

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr. justice k.haripal thursday, the 29th day of july 2021 / 7th sravana, 1943 bail appl. no. 4005 of 2021 crime no.51/2021 of cherpu police station, thrissur district petitioner/accused no.1: vijesh aged 23 years, s/o radhakrishnan, kolladikkal house, kodannur desam, kodannur, cherpu, thrissur, pin - 680014 by adv u.jayakrishnan respondent/complainant: state of kerala represented by public prosecutor, high court of kerala ernakulam, pin - 682031 by adv.sri.santhosh peter, sr.public prosecutor this bail application having come up for admission on 29.07.2021, the court on the same day delivered the following: bail appl.no.4005 of 2021 -2-orderpetitioner is the sole accused in crime no.51/2021 of cherpu police station, which was registered alleging offence under sections 20(b)(ii)a, 22(c) and 29 of the ndps act.2. the crime was registered on 22.01.2021, after seizing28.7 grams of mdma and 20 ml of hashish oil from the possession of the petitioner. on completion of investigation, charge sheet has already been laid. now the case is pending as s.c.no.361/20121 before the first additional sessions court, thrissur.3. even though the learned counsel persuaded me totake a lenient view stating that the petitioner is only 23 years old and is a first time offender, having regard to the embargo under section 37 of the ndps act, the court cannot show any kind of indulgence in favour of the petitioner. the application is devoid of merit and accordingly, is dismissed. sd/- k.haripal judge nkr/29.07.2021

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.HARIPAL THURSDAY, THE 29TH DAY OF JULY 2021 / 7TH SRAVANA, 1943 BAIL APPL. NO. 4005 OF 2021 CRIME NO.51/2021 OF CHERPU POLICE STATION, THRISSUR DISTRICT PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO.1: VIJESH AGED 23 YEARS, S/O RADHAKRISHNAN, KOLLADIKKAL HOUSE, KODANNUR DESAM, KODANNUR, CHERPU, THRISSUR, PIN - 680014 BY ADV U.JAYAKRISHNAN RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT: STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA ERNAKULAM, PIN - 682031 BY ADV.SRI.SANTHOSH PETER, SR.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 29.07.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: BAIL APPL.NO.4005 OF 2021 -2-

ORDER

Petitioner is the sole accused in crime No.51/2021 of Cherpu police station, which was registered alleging offence under Sections 20(b)(ii)A, 22(c) and 29 of the NDPS Act.

2. The crime was registered on 22.01.2021, after seizing

28.7 grams of MDMA and 20 ml of hashish oil from the possession of the petitioner. On completion of investigation, charge sheet has already been laid. Now the case is pending as S.C.No.361/20121 before the First Additional Sessions Court, Thrissur.

3. Even though the learned counsel persuaded me to

take a lenient view stating that the petitioner is only 23 years old and is a first time offender, having regard to the embargo under Section 37 of the NDPS Act, the court cannot show any kind of indulgence in favour of the petitioner. The application is devoid of merit and accordingly, is dismissed. Sd/- K.HARIPAL JUDGE nkr/29.07.2021

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial