Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

M/S Commandos Security Services vs the State of Karnataka and Ors

M/S Commandos Security Services vs The State of Karnataka and Ors

Type Court Judgment Court Karnataka Orders Decided Jul 01, 2025
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1640204

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Karnataka Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
WP/202633/2023

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

M/S Commandos Security Services

Respondent

The State of Karnataka and Ors

Excerpt

.....the impugnedorder dated 08.09.2023 bearing no.¸Á¤«/aiÀÄĸÉÃqæÃe/mÉaqÀg/À 2023-24, issued by the respondent no.4 at annexure-e, consequently the intimation dated 11.09.2023 published in the e-procurement by the respondent no.4 produced at annexure-e1 b) issue a writ of certiorari to quash the impugned fresh tender notification dated 11.09.2023 bearing no. ¸Á¤«/aiÀÄĸÉÃqæÃe/¹§âa¢ mÉaqÀg/À 2023-24, issued by the respondent no. 4 vide annexure-a1. c) issue a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to permit the petitioner to supply manpower in terms of workorder issued as per previous tender notification atannexure-a. this petition, coming on for preliminary hearing in ‘b’ group, this day, order was made therein as under: -3- coram: hon'ble mr. justice m.i.arunoral order(per: hon'ble mr. justice m.i.arun) the petitioner in the instant writ petition has challenged the tender notification issued for procuring manpower by the respondents for the financial year 2023-24.2. learned additional government advocate uponinstructions submits that the term of the tender has already come to an end and the state is going ahead with fresh tender and the petitioner can always participate in the same.3. for the aforementioned reasons, the writ petition is hereby dismissed as having become infructuous. sd/- (m.i.arun) judge sdu list no.: 1 sl no.: 40 ct:si

Full Judgment

-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA KALABURAGI BENCH DATED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF JULY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.I.ARUN WRIT PETITION NO.202633 OF 2023 (GM-TEN) BETWEEN: M/S COMMANDOS SECURITY SERVICES, OFF: 1, BLOCK NO. II, RUKMINI BUILDING, OPP: DISTRICT COURT, P. B. ROAD, DHARWAD-580008, BY ITS PROPRIETOR, NAZIRAHMED ABDUL DESAI, GPA HOLDER, AMIR S/O NAZEERAHMAD DESAI GORAWANKOL, AGE: 32 YEARS, OCC: PRIVATE WORK. Digitally signed by …PETITIONER SHIVALEELA DATTATRAYA UDAGI (BY SRI. ARUNKUMAR AMARGUNDAPPA, ADVOCATE) Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AND:

1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, EMPOWERMENT AND SPORTS, NO. 246 2ND GATE, 2ND FLOOR, M.S. BUILDING, BENGALURU-560001.

2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, VIJAYAPURA, -2-

3. THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, ZILLA PANCHAYAT, VIJAYAPURA,

4. THE ASSISTANT DIRECTOR,

EMPOWERMENT & SPORTS, DR. B.R AMBEDKAR STADIUM, TQ. & DIST. VIJAYAPURA-586101. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. MALLIKARJUN SAHUKAR, AGA FOR R1, R2 AND R4; SMT. RATNA N. SHIVAYOGIMATH, ADVOCATE FOR R3) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO A) ISSUE A WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED

ORDER DATED 08.09.2023 BEARING NO.

¸Á¤«/AiÀÄĸÉÃQæÃE/mÉAqÀg/À 2023-24, ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.4 AT ANNEXURE-E, CONSEQUENTLY THE INTIMATION DATED 11.09.2023 PUBLISHED IN THE E-PROCUREMENT BY THE RESPONDENT NO.4 PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-E1 B) ISSUE A WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED FRESH TENDER NOTIFICATION DATED 11.09.2023 BEARING NO. ¸Á¤«/AiÀÄĸÉÃQæÃE/¹§âA¢ mÉAqÀg/À 2023-24, ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT NO. 4 VIDE ANNEXURE-A1. C) ISSUE A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS DIRECTING THE RESPONDENTS TO PERMIT THE PETITIONER TO SUPPLY MANPOWER IN TERMS OF WORK

ORDER ISSUED AS PER PREVIOUS TENDER NOTIFICATION AT

ANNEXURE-A. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: -3- CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.I.ARUN

ORAL ORDER

(PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.I.ARUN) The petitioner in the instant writ petition has challenged the tender notification issued for procuring manpower by the respondents for the financial year 2023-24.

2. Learned Additional Government Advocate upon

instructions submits that the term of the tender has already come to an end and the State is going ahead with fresh tender and the petitioner can always participate in the same.

3. For the aforementioned reasons, the writ petition is hereby dismissed as having become infructuous. Sd/- (M.I.ARUN) JUDGE SDU LIST NO.: 1 SL NO.: 40 CT:SI

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial