Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Hanumanth vs the Commissioner

Hanumanth vs The Commissioner

Type Court Judgment Court Karnataka Orders Decided Jul 01, 2025
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1639909

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Karnataka Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
WP/201759/2025

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Hanumanth

Respondent

The Commissioner

Excerpt

-1- in the high court of karnataka kalaburagi bench dated this the 1st day of july, 2025 before the hon'ble mr. justice m.i.arun writ petition no.201759 of 2025 (lb-res) between: hanumanth s/o tammanna gonalkar, age: 59 years, r/o h.no.1-949/27/2a/part/36, near ganadevathe temple, opp. to k. h. b. colony, …petitioner (by sri. ravindra reddy, advocate) and:1. the commissioner digitally signed by varsha n of mahanagara palike, rasalkar office-1, kalaburagi-585101. location: high court of karnataka 2. sri. prakashs/o bhimsain rao, age: 65 years, occ: business, r/o h. no.2-602, dargha road, opp. big bazar jagat, kalaburagi through special power of attorney sri. gulam murtuza farhan s/o osman badesha, age: 38 years, occ: business, r/o h. no.1-964/1a/c 6th cross, adarsh marg, opp: railway station, gouse nagar, kalaburagi. -2-3. sri. vilas s. harwalkar s/o sridhar rao harwalkar, age: 76 years, occ: agriculture, r/o totappa chawl, station bazar, …respondents this writ petition is filed under articles 226 and 227 of the constitution of india, praying to issue writ or order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing dated 21.03.2025 in no. ªÀÄ£À¥Á/ªÀp- À À 1/41/2024-25 vide annexure-h1 and h2. this petition, coming on for orders, this day,order was made therein as under:coram: hon'ble mr. justice m.i.arunoral order(per: hon'ble mr. justice m.i.arun) after arguing the matter for some time, counsel for the petitioner submits that writ petition may be dismissed as withdrawn. the submission is placed on record. writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. sd/- (m.i.arun) judge vnr list no.: 1 sl no.: 10 ct:si

Full Judgment

-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA KALABURAGI BENCH DATED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF JULY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.I.ARUN WRIT PETITION NO.201759 OF 2025 (LB-RES) BETWEEN: HANUMANTH S/O TAMMANNA GONALKAR, AGE: 59 YEARS, R/O H.NO.1-949/27/2A/PART/36, NEAR GANADEVATHE TEMPLE, OPP. TO K. H. B. COLONY, …PETITIONER (BY SRI. RAVINDRA REDDY, ADVOCATE) AND:

1. THE COMMISSIONER Digitally signed by VARSHA N OF MAHANAGARA PALIKE, RASALKAR OFFICE-1, KALABURAGI-585101. Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA 2. SRI. PRAKASH

S/O BHIMSAIN RAO, AGE: 65 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS, R/O H. NO.2-602, DARGHA ROAD, OPP. BIG BAZAR JAGAT, KALABURAGI THROUGH SPECIAL POWER OF ATTORNEY SRI. GULAM MURTUZA FARHAN S/O OSMAN BADESHA, AGE: 38 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS, R/O H. NO.1-964/1A/C 6TH CROSS, ADARSH MARG, OPP: RAILWAY STATION, GOUSE NAGAR, KALABURAGI. -2-

3. SRI. VILAS S. HARWALKAR S/O SRIDHAR RAO HARWALKAR, AGE: 76 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O TOTAPPA CHAWL, STATION BAZAR, …RESPONDENTS THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO ISSUE WRIT OR ORDER OR DIRECTION IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI QUASHING DATED 21.03.2025 IN NO. ªÀÄ£À¥Á/ªÀP- À À 1/41/2024-25 VIDE ANNEXURE-H1 AND H2. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,

ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.I.ARUN

ORAL ORDER

(PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.I.ARUN) After arguing the matter for some time, counsel for the petitioner submits that writ petition may be dismissed as withdrawn. The submission is placed on record. Writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (M.I.ARUN) JUDGE VNR List No.: 1 Sl No.: 10 CT:SI

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial