R Jayakumar vs State of Kerala

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided May 27, 2021

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1639774

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1639774
Court: Kerala High Court
Judge: Honourable Mr. Justice B.Sudheendra Kumar
Decided On: May 27, 2021
Case Number: Bail Appl./3873/2021

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

R Jayakumar

Respondent

State of Kerala

Excerpt

.....registered for the offence punishable under section 58 of the abkari act on the allegation that on 7.5.2021 at about 5.00 p.m., the petitioner was found in possession of 9.555 litres of indian made foreign liquor, in contravention of the provisions of the abkari act.2. the petitioner was arrested from the spot and ever since he has been in custody.3. heard.4. the learned public prosecutor has noserious objection in granting bail to the petitioner. it has been submitted by the -3- learned public prosecutor that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent.5. considering the facts andcircumstances of the case, including the period of detention of the petitioner and also taking into consideration of the fact that the contraband seized is indian made foreign liquor, i am inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. in the result, this application stands allowed and the petitioner shall be enlargedon bail on condition of the petitioner executing a bond for rs.30,000/- (rupees thirty thousand only) with two solvent sureties, each for the like sum to thesatisfaction of the jurisdictional court and -4- subject to the following further conditions:- i. the petitioner shall report before the investigating officer as and when required by the investigating officer for interrogation. ii. the petitioner shall not intimidate or influence the witnesses or in any way tamper with the investigation. iii. the petitioner shall not get involved in any other similar offence during the pendency of this case. sd/- b. sudheendra kumar, judge stk

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE B.SUDHEENDRA KUMAR THURSDAY, THE 27TH DAY OF MAY 2021 / 6TH JYAISHTA, 1943 CRIME NO.36/2021 OF Devikulam Excise Range Office, Idukki PETITIONER/S: R JAYAKUMAR AGED 44 YEARS CHOLAMALI DIVISION,PERRIAVURRAI ESTATE,MUNNAR VILLAGEDEVIKULAM TALUK IDUKKI, PIN - 685612 BY ADV C.R.SIVAKUMAR RESPONDENT/S: 1 STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,HIGH COURT OF KERALA ERNAKULAM, PIN - 682031 2 THE EXCISE RANGE INSPECTOR EXCISE RANGE OFFICE, DEVIKULAM IDUKKI, PIN - 685613 BY SR. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SMT.M.K.PUSHPALATHA THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 27.05.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: -2-

ORDER

The petitioner is the accused in Crime No.36 of 2021 of Devikulam Excise Range registered for the offence punishable under Section 58 of the Abkari Act on the allegation that on 7.5.2021 at about 5.00 p.m., the petitioner was found in possession of 9.555 litres of Indian Made Foreign liquor, in contravention of the provisions of the Abkari Act.

2. The petitioner was arrested from the spot and ever since he has been in custody.

3. Heard.

4. The learned Public Prosecutor has no

serious objection in granting bail to the petitioner. It has been submitted by the -3- learned Public Prosecutor that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent.

5. Considering the facts and

circumstances of the case, including the period of detention of the petitioner and also taking into consideration of the fact that the contraband seized is Indian Made Foreign liquor, I am inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. In the result, this application stands allowed and the petitioner shall be enlarged

on      bail        on        condition       of    the     petitioner
executing a bond for Rs.30,000/-                                 (Rupees
thirty          thousand           only)      with       two     solvent
sureties,            each       for    the        like    sum    to   the

satisfaction of the Jurisdictional Court and -4- subject to the following further conditions:- i. The petitioner shall report before the Investigating Officer as and when required by the Investigating Officer for interrogation. ii. The petitioner shall not intimidate or influence the witnesses or in any way tamper with the investigation. iii. The petitioner shall not get involved in any other similar offence during the pendency of this case. Sd/- B. SUDHEENDRA KUMAR, JUDGE STK

Same Court & Year Kerala · 2021 Same Parties R Jayakumar vs State of Kerala Same Judge Honourable Mr. Justice B.Sudheendra Kumar