Antoney E.J vs Union of India

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Jul 30, 2021

~3 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1639283

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1639283
Court: Kerala High Court
Judge: Honourable Mr. Justice a.M.Badar
Decided On: Jul 30, 2021
Case Number: WP(C)/11227/2021

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Antoney E.J

Respondent

Union of India

Excerpt

.....for the petitioner, in the light of paragraph no.9 of the statement of respondent nos.1 and 2, submits that the petitioner shall take online appointment and visit the passport seva kendra, as per that appointment along with all original documents. if the petitioner takes the appointment and visits it is expected of the respondents to proceed further in the matter, instead of directing the petitioner to obtain declaratory decree. in the light of the fact that the petitioner had shown his willingness to comply the requirements stated by respondent nos. 1and 2 in paragraph no.9 of their statement by approaching the petition is ordered by directing the respondents to take decision in the matter after visit of the petitioner and on compliance of the formalities as stated in paragraph no.9 of the statement by the petitioner as expeditiously as possible. the petition, is disposed of as above. sd/- a.m.badar judge ssk/30/07 appendix petitioner's exhibits: exhibit p1 true copy of indian passport of the petitioner bearingno.p 2693682 issued by the 2nd respondent on 15.7.16. exhibit p2 true copy of birth certificate of the petitioner issued by the sub registrar of births and deaths, thrissur municipal corporation bearing no. 80100170-8103 23 2574 dated 3.12.13. exhibit p3 true copy of aadhar card of the petitioner bearing no.8322 0397 5281 exhibit p4 true copy of the corrected aadhar card of the petitioner bearing no. 8322 0397 5281 exhibit p5 true copy of online application filed by the petitioner through passport seva kendra thrissur before the 2nd respondent bearing reference no.21-1002363055 dated 5.4.21. exhibit p6 true copy of petition filed by petitioner before 2nd respondent on 8.4.21. respondent's exhibits:nilssk //true copy// pa to judge

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.M.BADAR FRIDAY, THE 30TH DAY OF JULY 2021 / 8TH SRAVANA, 1943 WP(C) NO. 11227 OF 2021 PETITIONER: ANTONEY E.J., AGED 40 YEARS, S/O.JOSE, ELUVATHUNGAL HOUSE, KAINOOR P.O., PUTHUR, THRISSUR DISTRICT, PIN 680 014. BY ADV V.RAJENDRAN (PERUMBAVOOR) RESPONDENTS: 1 UNION OF INDIA REP. BY SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF EXTERNAL AFFAIRS, F-5, STREET G, JAWAHAR LAL NEHRU UNIVERSITY, OLD JNU CAMPUS, MUNIRKA, NEW DELHI 110 067 2 THE REGIONAL PASSPORT OFFICER, SHIHAB THANGAL ROAD, NEAR IDBI CORPORATE BRANCH, PANAMPILLY NAGAR, KOCHI 682 036 R1-2 BY ADV SHRI.P.VIJAYAKUMAR, ASG OF INDIA THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 30.07.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

JUDGMENT

Dated this the 30th day of July 2021 The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, in the light of paragraph No.9 of the statement of respondent Nos.1 and 2, submits that the petitioner shall take online appointment and visit the Passport Seva Kendra, as per that appointment along with all original documents. If the petitioner takes the appointment and visits it is expected of the respondents to proceed further in the matter, instead of directing the petitioner to obtain declaratory decree. In the light of the fact that the petitioner had shown his willingness to comply the requirements stated by respondent Nos. 1and 2 in paragraph No.9 of their statement by approaching the petition is ordered by directing the respondents to take decision in the matter after visit of the petitioner and on compliance of the formalities as stated in Paragraph No.9 of the statement by the petitioner as expeditiously as possible. The petition, is disposed of as above. Sd/- A.M.BADAR JUDGE SSK/30/07 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXHIBIT P1 TRUE COPY OF INDIAN PASSPORT OF THE PETITIONER BEARING

NO.P 2693682 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT ON 15.7.16. EXHIBIT P2 TRUE COPY OF BIRTH CERTIFICATE OF THE PETITIONER ISSUED BY THE SUB REGISTRAR OF BIRTHS AND DEATHS, THRISSUR MUNICIPAL CORPORATION BEARING NO. 80100170-8103 23 2574 DATED 3.12.13. EXHIBIT P3 TRUE COPY OF AADHAR CARD OF THE PETITIONER BEARING NO.8322 0397 5281 EXHIBIT P4 TRUE COPY OF THE CORRECTED AADHAR CARD OF THE PETITIONER BEARING NO. 8322 0397 5281 EXHIBIT P5 TRUE COPY OF ONLINE APPLICATION FILED BY THE PETITIONER THROUGH PASSPORT SEVA KENDRA THRISSUR BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT BEARING REFERENCE NO.21-1002363055 DATED 5.4.21. EXHIBIT P6 TRUE COPY OF PETITION FILED BY PETITIONER BEFORE 2ND RESPONDENT ON 8.4.21. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS:NIL

SSK //TRUE COPY// PA TO JUDGE

Same Court & Year Kerala · 2021 Same Parties Antoney E.J vs Union of India Same Judge Honourable Mr. Justice a.M.Badar