Anjaneya vs the District and Sessions Court and Ors

Anjaneya vs The District and Sessions Court and Ors

Type Court Judgment Court Karnataka Orders Decided Apr 28, 2025

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1639167

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1639167
Court: Karnataka Orders High Court
Judge: Chillakur Sumalatha
Decided On: Apr 28, 2025
Case Number: WP/202091/2023

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Anjaneya

Respondent

The District and Sessions Court and Ors

Excerpt

.....judge & jmfc court, court complex, yadgiri by the chief ministerail officer (cmo)3. the civil judge & jmfccourt, dept. of accounts, court complex, yadgiri, by the sheristedar (accounts), …respondents (by sri. sheshadri jaishankar, aga) -2- this writ petition is filed under articles 226 & 227 of the constitution of india, praying to issue a writ of mandamus or any other command or order of the like nature and direct the respondent nos.2 and 3 for immediate compliance of the orders dated 03.06.2019 & 07.07.2021 of the civil judge & jmfc yadgiri vide annexure-a & a1 and further also direct for compliance of order dated: 04.07.2023 in o.s.no.106/2012 of civil judge and jmfc yadgiri vide annuexure-b. this petition, coming on for orders, this day,order was made therein as under:coram: hon'ble dr. justice chillakur sumalathaoral order(per: hon'ble dr. justice chillakur sumalatha) learned counsel for the writ petitioner sri.varun patil submits that the writ petition might have become infructuous. the writ petition is filed in the month of july- 2023 and till now office objections are not complied. no reasons are put forth as to why the petitioner did not choose to comply the office objection till now. -3- this court does not find any grounds whatsoever to adjourn the matter. therefore, the writ petition stands dismissed for non-compliance of office objections. sd/- (dr.chillakur sumalatha) judge vnr list no.: 1 sl no.: 1 ct:ni

Full Judgment

-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA KALABURAGI BENCH DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF APRIL, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA WRIT PETITION NO.202091 OF 2023 (LA-RES) BETWEEN: ANJANEYA S/O. YAMANAPPA, AGE: 46 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS, R/O: VILLAGE BADIYAL, TQ. & DIST: YADGIRI. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. SHIVANAND PATIL, ADVOCATE & SRI. VARUN PATIL, ADVOCATE) AND:
1. THE DISTRICT & SESSIONS COURT,
Digitally signed        COURT COMPLEX, YADGIRI
by LUCYGRACE            BY THE CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE
Location: HIGH          OFFICER (CAO),
COURT OF KARNATAKA 2. THE CIVIL JUDGE & JMFC COURT, COURT COMPLEX, YADGIRI BY THE CHIEF MINISTERAIL OFFICER (CMO)
3. THE CIVIL JUDGE & JMFC
COURT, DEPT. OF ACCOUNTS, COURT COMPLEX, YADGIRI, BY THE SHERISTEDAR (ACCOUNTS), …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. SHESHADRI JAISHANKAR, AGA) -2- THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT OF MANDAMUS OR ANY OTHER COMMAND OR ORDER OF THE LIKE NATURE AND DIRECT THE RESPONDENT NOS.2 AND 3 FOR IMMEDIATE COMPLIANCE OF THE ORDERS DATED 03.06.2019 & 07.07.2021 OF THE CIVIL JUDGE & JMFC YADGIRI VIDE ANNEXURE-A & A1 AND FURTHER ALSO DIRECT FOR COMPLIANCE OF ORDER DATED: 04.07.2023 IN O.S.NO.106/2012 OF CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC YADGIRI VIDE ANNUEXURE-B. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,

ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM: HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA

ORAL ORDER

(PER: HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA) Learned counsel for the writ petitioner Sri.Varun Patil submits that the writ petition might have become infructuous. The writ petition is filed in the month of July- 2023 and till now office objections are not complied. No reasons are put forth as to why the petitioner did not choose to comply the office objection till now. -3- This Court does not find any grounds whatsoever to adjourn the matter. Therefore, the writ petition stands dismissed for non-compliance of office objections. Sd/- (Dr.CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA) JUDGE VNR List No.: 1 Sl No.: 1 CT:NI

Same Court & Year Karnataka Orders · 2025 Same Parties Anjaneya vs The District and Sessions Court and Ors Same Judge Chillakur Sumalatha