Muniyandi Vs The District Collector

Muniyandi vs The District Collector

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Orders Decided May 27, 2026

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1638111

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1638111
Court: Chennai Orders High Court
Judge: Honourable Mr Justice a.D.Jagadish Chandira
Decided On: May 27, 2026
Case Number: WP(MD)/14381/2026

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Muniyandi

Respondent

The District Collector

Excerpt

.....event is conducted in marandhai village, kalaiyarkovil taluk, sivagangai district on 30.05.2023 in any future date without permission of the first respondent. for appellants : mr.r.suriya for respondents : mrs.k.porkodi (rr1, 3 to 6) counsel for state of tamil nadu mr.t.lenin kumar (r2 & r7) counsel for state of tamil nadu mr.arun swaminathan (r8)orderthis writ petition is filed seeking a direction to the respondents herein to ensure that no illegal vada manju virattu event is conducted in marandhai village, kalaiyarkovil taluk, sivagangai district on 30.05.2026. 2.today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents 1 and 3 to 6, on instructions, submits that there is rivalry between the petitioner and the private respondent herein and that, apprehending breach of peace and law and order issues, the fifth respondent has decided not to grant permission to any person to conduct manjuvirattu event in the village in question. 3.the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent police submits that a case in csr no.528 of 2026 has been registered based on the complaint given by the petitioner herein. 4.recording above submissions that permission has not been granted, this writ petition is closed. consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. there shall be no order as to costs. 27.05.2026 internet: yes/no index: yes/no ta to 1.the district collector, 2.the superintendent of police, 3.the regional joint director of animal husbandry, sivagangai region, sivagangai. 4.the deputy director of public health and preventive medicine, sivagangai district, sivagangai. 5.the tahsildar, kalaiyarkoil taluk, 6.the village administrative officer, marandhai village group, 7.the inspector of police, kalaiyarkoil police station, kalaiyarkoil.a.d.jagadish chandira, j.ta w.p.(md)no.14381 of 2026 27.05.2026

Full Judgment

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 27.05.2026
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA W.P.(MD)No.14381 of 2026 and W.M.P.(MD)No.10816 of 2026 Muniyandi ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The District Collector, 2.The Superintendent of Police, 3.The Regional Joint Director of Animal Husbandry, Sivagangai Region, Sivagangai. 4.The Deputy Director of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Sivagangai District, Sivagangai. 5.The Tahsildar, Kalaiyarkoil Taluk, 6.The Village Administrative Officer, Marandhai Village Group, 7.The Inspector of Police, Kalaiyarkoil Police Station, Kalaiyarkoil. 8.M.Thiruvasagam ...Respondents
PRAYER:- Writ Petition - filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 1 to 7 herein to ensure that no illegal vada Manju Virattu event is conducted in Marandhai Village, Kalaiyarkovil Taluk, Sivagangai District on 30.05.2023 in any future date without permission of the first respondent. For Appellants : Mr.R.Suriya For Respondents : Mrs.K.Porkodi (RR1, 3 to 6) Counsel for State of Tamil Nadu Mr.T.Lenin Kumar (R2 & R7) Counsel for State of Tamil Nadu Mr.Arun Swaminathan (R8)

ORDER

This writ petition is filed seeking a direction to the respondents herein to ensure that no illegal vada manju virattu event is conducted in Marandhai Village, Kalaiyarkovil Taluk, Sivagangai District on 30.05.2026. 2.Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents 1 and 3 to 6, on instructions, submits that there is rivalry between the petitioner and the private respondent herein and that, apprehending breach of peace and law and order issues, the fifth respondent has decided not to grant permission to any person to conduct Manjuvirattu event in the village in question. 3.The learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent Police submits that a case in CSR No.528 of 2026 has been registered based on the complaint given by the petitioner herein. 4.Recording above submissions that permission has not been granted, this writ petition is closed. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. There shall be no order as to costs. 27.05.2026 Internet: Yes/No Index: Yes/No ta To 1.The District Collector, 2.The Superintendent of Police, 3.The Regional Joint Director of Animal Husbandry, Sivagangai Region, Sivagangai. 4.The Deputy Director of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Sivagangai District, Sivagangai. 5.The Tahsildar, Kalaiyarkoil Taluk, 6.The Village Administrative Officer, Marandhai Village Group, 7.The Inspector of Police, Kalaiyarkoil Police Station, Kalaiyarkoil.

A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA, J.

ta W.P.(MD)No.14381 of 2026 27.05.2026

Same Court & Year Chennai Orders · 2026 Same Parties Muniyandi vs The District Collector Same Judge Honourable Mr Justice a.D.Jagadish Chandira