Shilparani vs the State of Karnataka

Shilparani vs The State of Karnataka

Type Court Judgment Court Karnataka Kalaburagi Decided Apr 29, 2025

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1637214

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1637214
Court: Karnataka Kalaburagi High Court
Judge: K Natarajan,Vijaykumar a. Patil
Decided On: Apr 29, 2025
Case Number: RP/200015/2025

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Shilparani

Respondent

The State of Karnataka

Excerpt

.....- 560001. mathapati location: high 2. the dy. director of women court of & child development department, karnataka bidar - 585101.3. the child development & planning officer, tq: bidar, dist: bidar - 585101.4. the dy. commissioner bidar district, bidar - 585101.5. smt. premala w/o tukaram, age: 34 years, anganawadi assistant, tadapalli village, taluk & dist: bidar - 585403. …respondents -2- this review petition filed under order 47 rule 1 r/w section 114 of cpc, praying to review the impugned judgement and final order dated 04.03.2025 passed by this honourable court in wa no. this petition, coming on for admission, this day,order was made therein as under:coram: hon'ble mr justice k natarajan and hon'ble mr justice vijaykumar a. patiloral order(per: hon'ble mr justice vijaykumar a. patil) sri.huleppa heroor, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there is an error apparent on the record in the impugned order dated 04.03.2025 passed by this court in w.a.no.200116/2023. it is submitted that this court has recorded the finding that the appellant has filed objections with regard to the residential certificate of the review petitioner. however, no such objections were filed.2. we have heard the arguments and perused the material available on record. we do not find any error apparent on the face of record to call for interference in this petition. -3-3. insofar as the contention that the appellant hasnot filed any objections to the residential certificate of the review petitioner, definitely the authority will look into the same and if no such objections, they will take appropriate action as directed by this court. accordingly, review petition is disposed of. (k natarajan) (vijaykumar a. patil) msr list no.: 1 sl no.: 25 ct: ps

Full Judgment

-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, KALABURAGI BENCH DATED THIS THE 29TH DAY OF APRIL, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE K NATARAJAN AND THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL REVIEW PETITION NO. 200015 OF 2025 BETWEEN: SMT. SHILPARANI W/O LATE RAMDAS, AGE: 33 YEARS, OCC: NIL, R/O TADAPALLI VILLAGE, TQ & DIST: BIDAR - 585101. …PETITIONER (BY SRI HULEPPA HEROOR, ADVOCATE) AND:
1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, WOMEN AND CHILD DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, VIDHANA SOUDHA, Digitally signed by RAMESH BENGALURU - 560001. MATHAPATI Location: HIGH 2. THE DY. DIRECTOR OF WOMEN COURT OF & CHILD DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, KARNATAKA BIDAR - 585101.

3. THE CHILD DEVELOPMENT & PLANNING OFFICER, TQ: BIDAR, DIST: BIDAR - 585101.

4. THE DY. COMMISSIONER BIDAR DISTRICT, BIDAR - 585101.

5. SMT. PREMALA W/O TUKARAM, AGE: 34 YEARS, ANGANAWADI ASSISTANT, TADAPALLI VILLAGE, TALUK & DIST: BIDAR - 585403. …RESPONDENTS -2- THIS REVIEW PETITION FILED UNDER ORDER 47 RULE 1 R/W SECTION 114 OF CPC, PRAYING TO REVIEW THE IMPUGNED JUDGEMENT AND FINAL ORDER DATED 04.03.2025 PASSED BY THIS HONOURABLE COURT IN WA NO. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY,

ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE K NATARAJAN AND HON'BLE MR JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL

ORAL ORDER

(PER: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL) Sri.Huleppa Heroor, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there is an error apparent on the record in the impugned order dated 04.03.2025 passed by this Court in W.A.No.200116/2023. It is submitted that this Court has recorded the finding that the appellant has filed objections with regard to the residential certificate of the review petitioner. However, no such objections were filed.

2. We have heard the arguments and perused the material available on record. We do not find any error apparent on the face of record to call for interference in this petition. -3-

3. Insofar as the contention that the appellant has

not filed any objections to the residential certificate of the review petitioner, definitely the authority will look into the same and if no such objections, they will take appropriate action as directed by this Court. Accordingly, review petition is disposed of. (K NATARAJAN) (VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL) MSR List No.: 1 Sl No.: 25 CT: PS

Same Court & Year Karnataka Kalaburagi · 2025 Same Parties Shilparani vs The State of Karnataka Same Judge K Natarajan,Vijaykumar a. Patil