Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Sabavva and Ors vs Kashinath and Anr

Sabavva and Ors vs Kashinath and Anr

Type Court Judgment Court Karnataka Orders Decided Jul 01, 2025
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1635903

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Karnataka Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
MFA/200627/2020

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Sabavva and Ors

Respondent

Kashinath and Anr

Excerpt

-1- in the high court of karnataka, kalaburagi bench dated this the 1st day of july, 2025 before the hon'ble mr. justice ravi v hosmani miscl. first appeal no. 200627 of 2020 (mv-d) between:1. sabavva w/o late gundappa, age: 53 years, occ: household, 2.. ramesh s/o late gundappa age: 35 years, occ: labour,3. kavita d/o late gundappa, (w/o hanumanth), age: 34 years, digitally signedby nijamuddin 4. adeppa jamkhandi s/o late gundappa, location: high age: 31 years, court of occ: student,karnataka5. savitha d/o late gundappa, (w/o sudhakar), age: 28 years, all are r/o: ainapur, tq: chincholi, now at kumbarwada, bidar. …appellants (by sri sandeep vijaykumar, advocate - absent) -2- and:1. kashinath s/o veerappa, age: major, occ: business, r/o: h.no.1/59, bambalgi village, tq: and dist: bidar - 585 401. (owner of vehicle)2. the branch manager, national insurance company ltd., branch office, anupan complex, basveshwar chowk, gandhi gunj road, bidar - 585 401. …respondents (by sri rahul r. asture, advocate for r2 - absent) this mfa is filed under section 173(1) of mv act,praying modify the judgment and award dated 05.12.2017 passed in mvc no.293/2016 on the file court of the additional senior civil judge and addl. mact at bidar, in the interest of justice and equity and etc.this mfa, coming on for orders, this day, judgmentwas delivered therein as under: coram: hon'ble mr. justice ravi v hosmanioral judgmentnone appears.2. it is seen on previous date i.e., 18.06.2025, despite undertaking to file application for substituted service of notice to respondent no.1 was not filed and request for further time was granted on cost. -3-3. today, neither cost is paid nor counsel is present. hence, appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. sd/- (ravi v hosmani) judge sn list no.: 1 sl no.: 9

Full Judgment

-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, KALABURAGI BENCH DATED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF JULY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI MISCL. FIRST APPEAL NO. 200627 OF 2020 (MV-D) BETWEEN:

1. SABAVVA W/O LATE GUNDAPPA, AGE: 53 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD, 2.. RAMESH S/O LATE GUNDAPPA AGE: 35 YEARS, OCC: LABOUR,

3. KAVITA D/O LATE GUNDAPPA, (W/O HANUMANTH), AGE: 34 YEARS, Digitally signed

by NIJAMUDDIN      4.    ADEPPA
JAMKHANDI                S/O LATE GUNDAPPA,
Location: HIGH           AGE: 31 YEARS,
COURT OF                 OCC: STUDENT,

KARNATAKA

5. SAVITHA D/O LATE GUNDAPPA, (W/O SUDHAKAR), AGE: 28 YEARS, ALL ARE R/O: AINAPUR, TQ: CHINCHOLI, NOW AT KUMBARWADA, BIDAR. …APPELLANTS (BY SRI SANDEEP VIJAYKUMAR, ADVOCATE - ABSENT) -2- AND:

1. KASHINATH S/O VEERAPPA, AGE: MAJOR, OCC: BUSINESS, R/O: H.NO.1/59, BAMBALGI VILLAGE, TQ: AND DIST: BIDAR - 585 401. (OWNER OF VEHICLE)

2. THE BRANCH MANAGER, NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD., BRANCH OFFICE, ANUPAN COMPLEX, BASVESHWAR CHOWK, GANDHI GUNJ ROAD, BIDAR - 585 401. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI RAHUL R. ASTURE, ADVOCATE FOR R2 - ABSENT) THIS MFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 173(1) OF MV ACT,

PRAYING MODIFY THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 05.12.2017 PASSED IN MVC NO.293/2016 ON THE FILE COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND ADDL. MACT AT BIDAR, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY AND ETC.

THIS MFA, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT

WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI

ORAL JUDGMENT

None appears.

2. It is seen on previous date i.e., 18.06.2025, despite undertaking to file application for substituted service of notice to respondent no.1 was not filed and request for further time was granted on cost. -3-

3. Today, neither cost is paid nor counsel is present. Hence, appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (RAVI V HOSMANI) JUDGE SN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 9

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial