Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Nagalingappa vs the State of Karnataka

Nagalingappa vs The State of Karnataka

Type Court Judgment Court Karnataka Kalaburagi Decided Feb 28, 2025
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1635534

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Karnataka Kalaburagi High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
CRL.P/200315/2025

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Nagalingappa

Respondent

The State of Karnataka

Excerpt

-1- in the high court of karnataka, kalaburagi bench dated this the 28th day of february, 2025 before the hon'ble mr. justice s.vishwajith shetty criminal petition no.200315 of 2025 (439(cr.pc)/483(bnss)) between: nagalingappa s/o gaddeppa, age: 33 years, occ: agriculture, r/o. rampura village, tq. lingasugur, dist.raichur -584125. …petitioner (by sri mahantesh patil, advocate) and: the state of karnataka, r/by addl. spp, digitally signed high court of karnataka, by shivakumarhiremath bench at kalaburagi, location: high (through mudgal ps, court of tq. lingasugur, dist.raichur-584125.karnataka …respondent (by sri. veeranagouda malipatil, hcgp) this crl.p. is filed u/s. 439 of cr.p.c (old) u/sec 483 of bnss, praying to, grant the regular bail to the petitioner in mudgal p.s in crime no. 65/2024 for the offence punishable u/sec 498(a), 302, 317 of ipc pending on the file of addl. civil judge and jmfc at lingasugur. -2- this petition coming on for orders, this day,order was made therein as under:coram: hon'ble mr. justice s.vishwajith shettyoral order(per: hon'ble mr. justice s.vishwajith shetty)1. learned counsel for the petitioner submits that,the petition may be dismissed as not pressed with liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh bail application after the material charge-sheet witnesses are examined.2. his submission is placed on record.3. accordingly, the petition is dismissed as not pressed, as prayed for.4. it is needless to state that, the prosecution, aswell as the trial court, shall make endeavor to examine the material charge-sheet witnesses, on priority. sd/- (s.vishwajith shetty) judge svh list no.: 1 sl no.: 14 ct:pk

Full Judgment

-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, KALABURAGI BENCH DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.VISHWAJITH SHETTY CRIMINAL PETITION NO.200315 OF 2025 (439(Cr.PC)/483(BNSS)) BETWEEN: NAGALINGAPPA S/O GADDEPPA, AGE: 33 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O. RAMPURA VILLAGE, TQ. LINGASUGUR, DIST.RAICHUR -584125. …PETITIONER (BY SRI MAHANTESH PATIL, ADVOCATE) AND: THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, R/BY ADDL. SPP, Digitally signed HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, by SHIVAKUMAR

HIREMATH           BENCH AT KALABURAGI,
Location: HIGH     (THROUGH MUDGAL PS,
COURT OF           TQ. LINGASUGUR, DIST.RAICHUR-584125.

KARNATAKA …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. VEERANAGOUDA MALIPATIL, HCGP) THIS CRL.P. IS FILED U/S. 439 OF CR.P.C (OLD) U/SEC 483 OF BNSS, PRAYING TO, GRANT THE REGULAR BAIL TO THE PETITIONER IN MUDGAL P.S IN CRIME NO. 65/2024 FOR THE OFFENCE PUNISHABLE U/SEC 498(A), 302, 317 OF IPC PENDING ON THE FILE OF ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC AT LINGASUGUR. -2- THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,

ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.VISHWAJITH SHETTY

ORAL ORDER

(PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.VISHWAJITH SHETTY)

1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that,

the petition may be dismissed as not pressed with liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh bail application after the material charge-sheet witnesses are examined.

2. His submission is placed on record.

3. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as not pressed, as prayed for.

4. It is needless to state that, the Prosecution, as

well as the Trial Court, shall make endeavor to examine the material charge-sheet witnesses, on priority. Sd/- (S.VISHWAJITH SHETTY) JUDGE SVH List No.: 1 Sl No.: 14 CT:PK

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial