Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Dr Rodhe and Ors vs Sukeerta and Anr

Dr Rodhe and Ors vs Sukeerta and Anr

Type Court Judgment Court Karnataka Orders Decided Apr 28, 2025
~3 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1635452

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Karnataka Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
CRL.P/200341/2022

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Dr Rodhe and Ors

Respondent

Sukeerta and Anr

Excerpt

.....teacher, r/o plot no.1, near hanuman temple, shivnagar (north), bidar-585401.2. the state of karnataka through,child development project officer, department of women and children development, mailur road, bidar- 585401, represented by addl. spp, high court of karnataka, kalaburagi bench.…respondents (by sri jairaj k. bukka, advocate for r1; sri jamadar shahabuddin, hcgp for r2) -3- this crl.p. is filed u/s.482 of cr.p.c. praying to, allow this petition and to quash all the proceedings in crl.misc.no.1078/2020 in the court of ii addl. civil judge and jmfc, bidar circle, so far as the respondent nos. 1 and 8 petitioners herein are concerned for the alleged offences punishable under sections 12(1), 18 and 22 of dv act. this petition, coming on for orders, this day,order was made therein as under:coram: hon'ble mr. justice s rachaiahoral order(per: hon'ble mr. justice s rachaiah) learned counsel for the petitioners has filed a memo seeking leave of this court to withdraw the petition. learned counsel for respondent no.1 sri jairaj k. bukka submits that as against the order passed by the trial court, the appeal lies before the sessions court. however, by passing the procedure as contemplated under the law, this petition is filed which is not maintainable. -4- having considered the said submission and considering the memo, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to approach the sessions court. sd/- (s rachaiah) judge rsp list no.: 1 sl no.: 1 ct:pk

Full Judgment

-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, KALABURAGI BENCH DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF APRIL, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S RACHAIAH CRIMINAL PETITION NO.200341 OF 2022 (482(Cr.PC)/528(BNSS)) BETWEEN:

1. DR. RODHE W/O DR. JAYARAJ, AGE: 29 YEARS, OCC: DOCTOR,

2. ELIZABATH W/O BHOJAPPA METAGE,

AGE: 64 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEWIFE, Digitally signed 3. BHOJAPPA METGE S/O SAMBANNA METAGE, by RENUKA AGE: 67 YEARS, OCC: SOCIAL WORKER, Location: HIGH COURT OF R/O H.NO.8-6-388/1, ELIZABATH NIVAS, KARNATAKA KHB COLONY, BEHIND MEDICAL COLLEGE,

4. GEORGE FERNADES S/O BHOJAPPA METAGE, AGE: 37 YEARS,

5. FRANKLIN S/O BHOJAPPA METAGE, AGE: 34 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESSMAN, -2-

6. MARY W/O ABRAHAM JOHN (D/O BHOJAPPA), AGE: 41 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD,

7. MARTHA D/O BHOJAPPA, AGE: 39 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEWIFE, R/O NEAR FIRE STATION, BIDAR.

8. MARIAMMA AGE: 82 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD, R/O EDEN COLONY, …PETITIONERS (BY SRI SHIVAPUTRA S. UDABALKAR, ADVOCATE) AND:

1. SUKEERTA W/O LATE BHASKER, AGE: 67 YEARS, OCC: RETIRED TEACHER, R/O PLOT NO.1, NEAR HANUMAN TEMPLE, SHIVNAGAR (NORTH), BIDAR-585401.

2. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA THROUGH,

CHILD DEVELOPMENT PROJECT OFFICER, DEPARTMENT OF WOMEN AND CHILDREN DEVELOPMENT, MAILUR ROAD, BIDAR- 585401, REPRESENTED BY ADDL. SPP, HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, KALABURAGI BENCH.

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI JAIRAJ K. BUKKA, ADVOCATE FOR R1; SRI JAMADAR SHAHABUDDIN, HCGP FOR R2) -3- THIS CRL.P. IS FILED U/S.482 OF CR.P.C. PRAYING TO, ALLOW THIS PETITION AND TO QUASH ALL THE PROCEEDINGS IN CRL.MISC.NO.1078/2020 IN THE COURT OF II ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, BIDAR CIRCLE, SO FAR AS THE RESPONDENT NOS. 1 AND 8 PETITIONERS HEREIN ARE CONCERNED FOR THE ALLEGED OFFENCES PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTIONS 12(1), 18 AND 22 OF DV ACT. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,

ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S RACHAIAH

ORAL ORDER

(PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S RACHAIAH) Learned counsel for the petitioners has filed a memo seeking leave of this Court to withdraw the petition. Learned counsel for respondent No.1 Sri Jairaj K. Bukka submits that as against the order passed by the Trial Court, the appeal lies before the Sessions Court. However, by passing the procedure as contemplated under the law, this petition is filed which is not maintainable. -4- Having considered the said submission and considering the memo, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to approach the Sessions Court. Sd/- (S RACHAIAH) JUDGE RSP List No.: 1 Sl No.: 1 CT:PK

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial