Sangamesh vs the State of Karnataka

Sangamesh vs The State of Karnataka

Type Court Judgment Court Karnataka Orders Decided Jul 01, 2025

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1635297

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1635297
Court: Karnataka Orders High Court
Judge: V Srishananda
Decided On: Jul 01, 2025
Case Number: CRL.P/200215/2025

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Sangamesh

Respondent

The State of Karnataka

Excerpt

.....by addl. spp, location: high court of high court of karnataka, karnataka kalaburagi bench-585107.2. yallappa sheeparamatti, age:35 years, occ: assistant executive engineer, (aee), vigilance ps hescom, vijayapur-586101 …respondents (by sri jamadar shahabuddin, hcgp for r1; sri. sudarshan m., advocate for r2) -2- this crl.p is filed under section 528 of bnss,2023 praying to a) quash the fir and complaint in crime no.31/2025 of vigilance police station, bijapur (vijayapur) registered for the offence punishable u/secs. 135(1)(b) of electricity act pending on the file of ii additional dist. and sessions judge at vijayapura in so far as petitioner/ accused no.2 is concerned.b) pass any other appropriate order or directions as deemed fit by this hon’ble court under the facts and circumstance of the case.this petition coming on for admission, this day,order was made therein as under:coram: hon'ble mr. justice v srishanandaoral order(per: hon'ble mr. justice v srishananda) learned counsel for the petitioner files a memo. memo reads as under: “in the above mentioned case, the counsel for the petitioner is not pressing the petition. hence the same be taken as not pressed and be permitted to withdraw reserving the liberty to challenge the further proceedings.” -3- placing the memo on record, criminal petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty as prayed for. sd/- (v srishananda) judge srt list no.: 1 sl no.: 0 ct:pk

Full Judgment

-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, KALABURAGI BENCH DATED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF JULY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA CRIMINAL PETITION NO.200215 OF 2025 (482(Cr.PC)/528(BNSS)) BETWEEN: SANGAMESH S/O BHEEMANNA BIRADAR, AGE:36 YEARS, OCC: KARNATAKA BANK MANAGER, R/O. BIDAR, NOW RESIDING AT ALMEL, TQ. SINDAGI, DIST. VIJAYAPUR-586202. …PETITIONER (BY SRI SANTOSH PATIL, ADVOCATE) AND:
1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA,

THROUGH VIGILANCE POLICE STATION, VIJAYAPUR, Digitally signed by SUMITRA DIST. VIJAYAPUR-586101, SHERIGAR REPRESENTED BY ADDL. SPP, Location: HIGH COURT OF HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, KARNATAKA KALABURAGI BENCH-585107.

2. YALLAPPA SHEEPARAMATTI, AGE:35 YEARS, OCC: ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, (AEE), VIGILANCE PS HESCOM, VIJAYAPUR-586101 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI JAMADAR SHAHABUDDIN, HCGP FOR R1; SRI. SUDARSHAN M., ADVOCATE FOR R2) -2- THIS CRL.P IS FILED UNDER SECTION 528 OF BNSS,

2023 PRAYING TO A) QUASH THE FIR AND COMPLAINT IN CRIME NO.31/2025 OF VIGILANCE POLICE STATION, BIJAPUR (VIJAYAPUR) REGISTERED FOR THE OFFENCE PUNISHABLE U/SECS. 135(1)(B) OF ELECTRICITY ACT PENDING ON THE FILE OF II ADDITIONAL DIST. AND SESSIONS JUDGE AT VIJAYAPURA IN SO FAR AS PETITIONER/ ACCUSED NO.2 IS CONCERNED.B) PASS ANY OTHER APPROPRIATE ORDER OR DIRECTIONS AS DEEMED FIT BY THIS HON’BLE COURT UNDER THE FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCE OF THE CASE.

THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY,

ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA

ORAL ORDER

(PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA) Learned counsel for the petitioner files a memo. Memo reads as under: “In the above mentioned case, the counsel for the petitioner is not pressing the petition. Hence the same be taken as not pressed and be permitted to withdraw reserving the liberty to challenge the further proceedings.” -3- Placing the memo on record, criminal petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty as prayed for. Sd/- (V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE SRT List No.: 1 Sl No.: 0 CT:PK

Same Court & Year Karnataka Orders · 2025 Same Parties Sangamesh vs The State of Karnataka Same Judge V Srishananda