Machendra vs the State of Karnataka

Machendra vs The State of Karnataka

Type Court Judgment Court Karnataka Orders Decided Jul 02, 2025

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1635125

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1635125
Court: Karnataka Orders High Court
Judge: V Srishananda
Decided On: Jul 02, 2025
Case Number: CRL.P/200121/2024

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Machendra

Respondent

The State of Karnataka

Excerpt

.....food sirestedar, tahasil office, aurad-585226. dist. bidar …respondents (by sri. jamadar shahabuddin, hcgp for r1)this crl.p is filed u/s. 482 of cr.p.c (old ) u/sec. 528 of bnss act (new) praying to allow the present criminal petitioner and also quash the entire proceedings and -2-charge sheet registered fir in crime no.67/2020 was registered at santpur police station, bidar district and charge sheet filed before the hon’ble court against petitioner for the offence punishable u/sec. 18 of karnataka essential commodities (public distribution system) public control order 1992 and karnataka essential commodities u/sec. 3 and 7 in the interest of justice and equity. the said case trialed at addl. c.j. (jd) and jmfc aurad of bidar dist. ( c.c.no.557/2021)this petition, coming on for admission, this day,order was made therein as under:coram: hon'ble mr. justice v srishanandaoral order(per: hon'ble mr. justice v srishananda) learned counsel for the petitioners has filed a memo, which reads as under: “in the above case the filed petition is not maintainable. hence i want to withdraw the petition. it is prayed before hon’ble court kindly permit to withdraw the petition with liberty to file fresh petition in the interest of justice.”2. placing the memo on record, petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. sd/- (v srishananda) judge kcm list no.: 1 sl no.: 27 ct:pk

Full Judgment

-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, KALABURAGI BENCH DATED THIS THE 02ND DAY OF JULY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA CRIMINAL PETITION No.200121 OF 2024 (482(Cr.PC)/528(BNSS)) BETWEEN: MACHENDAR S/O DHULAPPA JAMADAR, AGE:44 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS, R/O. KASHAMPUR, TQ. AURAD, DIST. BIDAR-585226. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. AMEERAHAMAJA ABDULKADAR GUNNAPURA, ADVOCATE) AND:
1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA THROUGH,
Digitally signed SANTPUR POLICE STATION, by RENUKA Location: HIGH REPRESENTED BY THE, COURT OF ADDL. STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, KALABURAGI-585102.
2. RAVI SURYAWANSHI, FOOD SIRESTEDAR, TAHASIL OFFICE, AURAD-585226. DIST. BIDAR …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. JAMADAR SHAHABUDDIN, HCGP FOR R1)
THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S. 482 OF CR.P.C (OLD ) U/SEC. 528 OF BNSS ACT (NEW) PRAYING TO ALLOW THE PRESENT CRIMINAL PETITIONER AND ALSO QUASH THE ENTIRE PROCEEDINGS AND -2-
CHARGE SHEET REGISTERED FIR IN CRIME NO.67/2020 WAS REGISTERED AT SANTPUR POLICE STATION, BIDAR DISTRICT AND CHARGE SHEET FILED BEFORE THE HON’BLE COURT AGAINST PETITIONER FOR THE OFFENCE PUNISHABLE U/SEC. 18 OF KARNATAKA ESSENTIAL COMMODITIES (PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM) PUBLIC CONTROL ORDER 1992 AND KARNATAKA ESSENTIAL COMMODITIES U/SEC. 3 AND 7 IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY. THE SAID CASE TRIALED AT ADDL. C.J. (JD) AND JMFC AURAD OF BIDAR DIST. ( C.C.NO.557/2021)
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY,

ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA

ORAL ORDER

(PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA) Learned counsel for the petitioners has filed a memo, which reads as under: “In the above case the filed petition is not maintainable. Hence I want to withdraw the petition. It is prayed before Hon’ble Court kindly permit to withdraw the petition with liberty to file fresh petition in the interest of justice.”

2. Placing the memo on record, petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. Sd/- (V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE kcm List No.: 1 Sl No.: 27 CT:PK

Same Court & Year Karnataka Orders · 2025 Same Parties Machendra vs The State of Karnataka Same Judge V Srishananda