Sunil vs State of Karnataka

SUNIL vs State of Karnataka

Type Court Judgment Court Karnataka Orders Decided Jul 02, 2025

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1634638

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1634638
Court: Karnataka Orders High Court
Judge: M.I.Arun
Decided On: Jul 02, 2025
Case Number: WP/200272/2025

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

SUNIL

Respondent

State of Karnataka

Excerpt

-1- in the high court of karnataka kalaburagi bench dated this the 2nd day of july, 2025 before the hon'ble mr. justice m.i.arun writ petition no.200272 of 2025 (gm-police) between: sunil s/o sangappa, ctp-18716, aged about 20 years, r/at: tonasanahalli, sub district: chitapur, district: gulbarga, karnataka-585 228.…petitioner (by sri. sirajuddin ahmed, advocate) and: digitally signed by lucygrace 1. state of karnataka, location: high home department, court of karnataka through principal secretary, vidhana soudha, bengaluru-560 001.2. chief superintendent, central prison, kalaburagi-585 201. …respondents (by sri. mallikarjun sahukar, aga) -2- this writ petition is filed under articles 226 and 227 of the constitution of india, praying to issue writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ(s), order(s) or direction(s) and thereby; a. direct the respondent no.2 to releasepetitioner’s father sangappa ctp-18716 on general parole for a period of 90 days in accordance with law citing that illness of the petitioner who is a son of convict which is evident from the medical certificate issued by the taj multi-specialty hospital and also petitioner’s father has serve more than 16 years’ incarceration he has not been released on parole previously.b. pass any other order(s) which this court may deem fit and proper under the facts and circumstances of the case. this petition coming on for preliminary hearing in ‘b’ group this day, order was made therein as under: coram: hon'ble mr. justice m.i.arunoral order(per: hon'ble mr. justice m.i.arun) learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the writ petition has become infructuous. his submission is placed on record. -3- the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. sd/- (m.i.arun) judge lg list no.: 1 sl no.: 60

Full Judgment

-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA KALABURAGI BENCH DATED THIS THE 2ND DAY OF JULY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.I.ARUN WRIT PETITION NO.200272 OF 2025 (GM-POLICE) BETWEEN: SUNIL S/O SANGAPPA, CTP-18716, AGED ABOUT 20 YEARS, R/AT: TONASANAHALLI, SUB DISTRICT: CHITAPUR, DISTRICT: GULBARGA, KARNATAKA-585 228.

…PETITIONER (BY SRI. SIRAJUDDIN AHMED, ADVOCATE) AND: Digitally signed by LUCYGRACE 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA, Location: HIGH HOME DEPARTMENT, COURT OF KARNATAKA THROUGH PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BENGALURU-560 001.

2. CHIEF SUPERINTENDENT, CENTRAL PRISON, KALABURAGI-585 201. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. MALLIKARJUN SAHUKAR, AGA) -2- THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO ISSUE WRIT OF MANDAMUS OR ANY OTHER APPROPRIATE WRIT(S), ORDER(S) OR DIRECTION(S) AND THEREBY; A. DIRECT THE RESPONDENT NO.2 TO RELEASE

PETITIONER’S FATHER SANGAPPA CTP-18716 ON GENERAL PAROLE FOR A PERIOD OF 90 DAYS IN ACCORDANCE WITH LAW CITING THAT ILLNESS OF THE PETITIONER WHO IS A SON OF CONVICT WHICH IS EVIDENT FROM THE MEDICAL CERTIFICATE ISSUED BY THE TAJ MULTI-SPECIALTY HOSPITAL AND ALSO PETITIONER’S FATHER HAS SERVE MORE THAN 16 YEARS’ INCARCERATION HE HAS NOT BEEN RELEASED ON PAROLE PREVIOUSLY.

B. PASS ANY OTHER ORDER(S) WHICH THIS COURT MAY DEEM FIT AND PROPER UNDER THE FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE. THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.I.ARUN

ORAL ORDER

(PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.I.ARUN) Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the writ petition has become infructuous. His submission is placed on record. -3- The writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Sd/- (M.I.ARUN) JUDGE LG List No.: 1 Sl No.: 60

Same Court & Year Karnataka Orders · 2025 Same Parties SUNIL vs State of Karnataka Same Judge M.I.Arun