Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

X vs State of Kerala

X vs State of Kerala

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided May 24, 2021
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1632210

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
OP(Crl.)/183/2021

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

X

Respondent

State of Kerala

Excerpt

.....she was sexually abused by the accused, while she was working as a staff in the hospital owned by the accused. according to her, crime was registered as 2385 of 2013 of palluruthy police station and final report was laid. pursuant to it, cognizance was taken and summons was issued to the accused in sc.no.35 of 2016. the matter is pending trial even now. the limited prayer sought by the petitioner is for a direction for an expeditious disposal of the above case.2. heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned public prosecutor.3. the right of early disposal of the case especiallyof this nature is the prime concern of the society. having considered it, though the statistics of the cases pending before the i additional district and sessions court, ernakulam is not available and considering the fact that the sessions case is of the year 2016, i am inclined to dispose of the op(crl) itself, with a direction to the i addtional district and sessions court, ernakulam, totake up and dipose of sc.no.35 of 2016, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within a period of six months from the date of receipt of a copy of thisjudgment.op(crl) is disposed of. sd/- sunil thomas, judge r.av appendix petitioner's/s exhibits exhibit p1 the copy of the final report in sc no. 35 of 2016 in the files of the hon'ble 1st additional district and sessions court, ernakulam. respondent's/s nil exhibits

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL THOMAS MONDAY, THE 24TH DAY OF MAY 2021 / 3RD JYAISHTA, 1943 (IN CONNECTION WITH SC.NO.35 OF 2016 ON THE FILES OF THE HONOURABLE IST ADDITIONAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS COURT, ERNAKULAM) PETITIONER/S: XXX BY ADVS. K.R.VINOD SMT.M.S.LETHA KUM.K.S.SREEREKHA RESPONDENT/S: 1 STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, KOCHI 682 031 2 LOUIS GEORGE, AGED 74 YEARS S/O. LOUIS, H.NO 23/2801 OUR LADYS HOSPITAL, KACHERIPADY, PALLURUTHY, PIN 682 006 SR.PP SRI.C.N PRABHAKARAN THIS OP (CRIMINAL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 24.05.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

JUDGEMENT

The petitioner herein is the defacto complainant in SC.No.35 of 2016 of the I Additional District and

Sessions Court, Ernakulam. The allegation of the prosecution was that she was sexually abused by the accused, while she was working as a staff in the hospital owned by the accused. According to her, Crime was registered as 2385 of 2013 of Palluruthy Police Station and final report was laid. Pursuant to it, cognizance was taken and summons was issued to the accused in SC.No.35 of 2016. The matter is pending trial even now. The limited prayer sought by the petitioner is for a direction for an expeditious disposal of the above case.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Public Prosecutor.

3. The right of early disposal of the case especially

of this nature is the prime concern of the society. Having considered it, though the statistics of the cases pending before the I Additional District and Sessions Court, Ernakulam is not available and considering the fact that the Sessions Case is of the year 2016, I am inclined to dispose of the OP(Crl) itself, with a direction to the I Addtional District and Sessions Court, Ernakulam, to

take up and dipose of SC.NO.35 of 2016, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within a period of six months from the date of receipt of a copy of this

judgment.

OP(Crl) is disposed of. sd/- SUNIL THOMAS, JUDGE R.AV APPENDIX PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS EXHIBIT P1 THE COPY OF THE FINAL REPORT IN SC NO. 35 OF 2016 IN THE FILES OF THE HON'BLE 1ST ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT, ERNAKULAM. RESPONDENT'S/S NIL EXHIBITS

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial