Allengeorge vs Union of India

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Orders Decided Mar 31, 2021

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1625729

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1625729
Court: Kerala Orders High Court
Judge: Honourable Mrs. Justice Anu Sivaraman
Decided On: Mar 31, 2021
Case Number: WP(C)/8582/2021

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Allengeorge

Respondent

Union of India

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mrs. justice anu sivaraman wednesday, the 31st day of march 2021 / 10th chaithra, 1943 petitioner: allengeorge aged 30 years sneha nagar 161, uliyakovil post, kollam east, kollam district, pin - 691091. by adv. sri.rajan p.kaliyath respondents:1 union of india represented by the secretary, ministry of personal public grievance and pensions, department of personal and training, north block new delhi, pin - 110001. 2 the chairman union public service commission, dholpur house, upsc bhavan, shajahan road, man singh road, area, new delhi, pin - 110069. 3 union of india represented by the secretary, department of social justice and empowerment, ministry of social justice and empowerment, sasthri bhavan, new delhi - 110001.other present: thomas mathew illimoottil for r2 this writ petition (civil) having come up for admission on 31.03.2021, the court on the same day delivered the following:judgmentdated this the 31st day of march 2021 this writ petition is filed challenging the stipulation contained in rule 24 of notification dated 12.02.2020 and clause 10 and note 1 under clause 15.1 specify an ews certificate with a particular date. the essential challenge is against the cancellation of candidature of the petitioner.2. the learned standing counsel appearing for the 2 nd respondent submits that the writ petition is not maintainable before this court.3. the learned counsel for the petitioner thereforesubmits that the writ petition may be permitted to be withdrawn without prejudice to the right of the petitioner to move before the appropriate forum. the writ petition is, therefore, dismissed as withdrawn without prejudice to the contention of the petitioner and with liberty to move the appropriate forum, in accordance with law.sd/- anu sivaraman judge bng/03.04.2021

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN WEDNESDAY, THE 31ST DAY OF MARCH 2021 / 10TH CHAITHRA, 1943 PETITIONER: ALLENGEORGE AGED 30 YEARS SNEHA NAGAR 161, ULIYAKOVIL POST, KOLLAM EAST, KOLLAM DISTRICT, PIN - 691091. BY ADV. SRI.RAJAN P.KALIYATH RESPONDENTS:
1 UNION OF INDIA REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF PERSONAL PUBLIC GRIEVANCE AND PENSIONS, DEPARTMENT OF PERSONAL AND TRAINING, NORTH BLOCK NEW DELHI, PIN - 110001. 2 THE CHAIRMAN UNION PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION, DHOLPUR HOUSE, UPSC BHAVAN, SHAJAHAN ROAD, MAN SINGH ROAD, AREA, NEW DELHI, PIN - 110069. 3 UNION OF INDIA REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL JUSTICE AND EMPOWERMENT, MINISTRY OF SOCIAL JUSTICE AND EMPOWERMENT, SASTHRI BHAVAN, NEW DELHI - 110001.
OTHER PRESENT: THOMAS MATHEW ILLIMOOTTIL FOR R2 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 31.03.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

JUDGMENT

Dated this the 31st day of March 2021 This writ petition is filed challenging the stipulation contained in Rule 24 of notification dated 12.02.2020 and Clause 10 and Note 1 under Clause 15.1 specify an EWS certificate with a particular date. The essential challenge is against the cancellation of candidature of the petitioner.

2. The learned Standing Counsel appearing for the 2 nd respondent submits that the writ petition is not maintainable before this Court.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner therefore

submits that the writ petition may be permitted to be withdrawn without prejudice to the right of the petitioner to move before the appropriate forum. The writ petition is, therefore, dismissed as withdrawn without prejudice to the contention of the petitioner and with liberty to move the appropriate forum, in accordance with law.

Sd/- ANU SIVARAMAN JUDGE Bng/03.04.2021

Same Court & Year Kerala Orders · 2021 Same Parties Allengeorge vs Union of India Same Judge Honourable Mrs. Justice Anu Sivaraman