Sugadeeshan vs State of Kerala

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Orders Decided Apr 16, 2021

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1625517

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1625517
Court: Kerala Orders High Court
Judge: Honourable Mr. Justice K.Haripal
Decided On: Apr 16, 2021
Case Number: Bail Appl./2925/2021

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Sugadeeshan

Respondent

State of Kerala

Excerpt

.....pin-695605 by advs. sri.r.rajesh (varkala) sri.m.kiranlal sri.manu ramachandran sri.t.s.sarath shri.sameer m nair respondent: state of kerala represented by public prosecutor, high court of kerala pin - 682031 r1 by public prosecutor pp - sri. e,c,bineesh this bail application having come up for admission on 16.04.2021, the court on the same day passed the following:o r d e rthis is an application for regular bail filed under section 439 of the code of criminal procedure.2. the petitioner is the sole accused in crimeno.205/2021 of vizhinjam police station, thiruvananthapuram. the case was registered against the petitioner alleging offence punishable under sections 294(b), 341, 323, 324, 307 and 506(i) of ipc. the victim in the case is none other than the wife of the petitioner. it is seems that the crime was registered on the basis of the first information statement given by the 24 years old son of the victim.3. i heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and also the learned public prosecutor.4. the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted thathe has no criminal antecedents, he was arrested on 07.02.2021 and for the last 68 days he is in custody; he is also ready to abide by any condition imposed by this court.5. the learned public prosecutor seriously opposed theapplication. according to him, there was an earlier attempt on the life of the victim by the petitioner by pouring petrol on her and to set her ablaze. that means, this is the second attempt on the life of the wife. in the present incident, she has suffered very serious injuries and had been in intensive care for long. they have some family disputes also.in the circumstances, it is hazardous to release the petitioner on bail. therefore, this bail application is dismissed. sd/- k.haripal judge vpk

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.HARIPAL FRIDAY, THE 16TH DAY OF APRIL 2021 / 26TH CHAITHRA, 1943 CRIME NO.205/2021 OF Vizhinjam Police Station, Thiruvananthapuram PETITIONER/ACCUSED: SUGADEESHAN AGED 52 YEARS SWATHY LAND, MAVINMOODU, KALLAMBALAM, THIRUVNANTHAPURAM DISTRICT PIN-695605 BY ADVS. SRI.R.RAJESH (VARKALA) SRI.M.KIRANLAL SRI.MANU RAMACHANDRAN SRI.T.S.SARATH SHRI.SAMEER M NAIR RESPONDENT: STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA PIN - 682031 R1 BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR PP - SRI. E,C,BINEESH THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 16.04.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

O R D E R

This is an application for regular bail filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

2. The petitioner is the sole accused in Crime

No.205/2021 of Vizhinjam Police Station, Thiruvananthapuram. The case was registered against the petitioner alleging offence punishable under Sections 294(b), 341, 323, 324, 307 and 506(i) of IPC. The victim in the case is none other than the wife of the petitioner. It is seems that the crime was registered on the basis of the First Information Statement given by the 24 years old son of the victim.

3. I heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and also the learned Public Prosecutor.

4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that

he has no criminal antecedents, he was arrested on 07.02.2021 and for the last 68 days he is in custody; he is also ready to abide by any condition imposed by this Court.

5. The learned Public Prosecutor seriously opposed the

application. According to him, there was an earlier attempt on the life of the victim by the petitioner by pouring petrol on her and to set her ablaze. That means, this is the second attempt on the life of the wife. In the present incident, she has suffered very serious injuries and had been in intensive care for long. They have some family disputes also.

In the circumstances, it is hazardous to release the petitioner on bail. Therefore, this bail application is dismissed. Sd/- K.HARIPAL JUDGE VPK

Same Court & Year Kerala Orders · 2021 Same Parties Sugadeeshan vs State of Kerala Same Judge Honourable Mr. Justice K.Haripal