Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Bincy vs Joseph

BINCY vs Joseph

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Orders Decided Oct 28, 2021
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1624609

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Crl.Rev.Pet/2778/2004

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

BINCY

Respondent

Joseph

Excerpt

crl.rev.pet no. 2778 of 2004 1in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable dr. justice kauser edappagath thursday, the 28th day of october 2021 / 6th karthika, 1943 crl.rev.pet no. 2778 of 2004 against the judgment in cc 35/2002 of chief judicial magistrate ,thodupuzha, idukkirevision petitioner/complainant: bincy, d/o.t.s.skaria, thekkel veedu, pravithanam p.o. palai. sri.m.narendra kumar smt.leena krishnan respondents/accused: 1 joseph @ josemon, s/o.george, kanjiramkombil veettil, areekukzha kara,, manakadavu village. 2 sajini, d/o. abraham eatakunnel veedu, velliyamattam. 3 george, kanjiramkombil veedu, areekuzha kara, 4 rosamma, w/o. george kanjiramkombil veedu, areekuzha kara, 5 apachan @ paulose thalachirayil veedu, velliyamattam, thodupuzha. 6 state of kerala represented by public prosecutor, high court of kerala. sri.p.gopakumaran nair, sc, ibp.co.ltd. sri.p.noor zameer smt.m.k.pushpalatha - public prosecutor this criminal revision petition having come up for admission on 28.10.2021, the court on the same day delivered the following: crl.rev.pet no. 2778 of 2004 2o r d e rthe learned counsel for the revision petitioner submits that the revision petitioner is not prosecuting the revision. hence, the criminal revision petition is dismissed as not pressed. sd/- dr. kauser edappagath judge ab

Full Judgment

CRL.REV.PET NO. 2778 OF 2004 1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE KAUSER EDAPPAGATH THURSDAY, THE 28TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2021 / 6TH KARTHIKA, 1943 CRL.REV.PET NO. 2778 OF 2004 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN CC 35/2002 OF CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE ,THODUPUZHA, IDUKKI

REVISION PETITIONER/COMPLAINANT: BINCY, D/O.T.S.SKARIA, THEKKEL VEEDU, PRAVITHANAM P.O. PALAI. SRI.M.NARENDRA KUMAR SMT.LEENA KRISHNAN RESPONDENTS/ACCUSED: 1 JOSEPH @ JOSEMON, S/O.GEORGE, KANJIRAMKOMBIL VEETTIL, AREEKUKZHA KARA,, MANAKADAVU VILLAGE. 2 SAJINI, D/O. ABRAHAM EATAKUNNEL VEEDU, VELLIYAMATTAM. 3 GEORGE, KANJIRAMKOMBIL VEEDU, AREEKUZHA KARA, 4 ROSAMMA, W/O. GEORGE KANJIRAMKOMBIL VEEDU, AREEKUZHA KARA, 5 APACHAN @ PAULOSE THALACHIRAYIL VEEDU, VELLIYAMATTAM, THODUPUZHA. 6 STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA. SRI.P.GOPAKUMARAN NAIR, SC, IBP.CO.LTD. SRI.P.NOOR ZAMEER SMT.M.K.PUSHPALATHA - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 28.10.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: CRL.REV.PET NO. 2778 OF 2004 2

O R D E R

The learned counsel for the revision petitioner submits that the revision petitioner is not prosecuting the revision. Hence, the Criminal Revision Petition is dismissed as not pressed. Sd/- DR. KAUSER EDAPPAGATH JUDGE ab

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial