Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Aneesh.S vs State of Kerala

Aneesh.S vs State of Kerala

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Orders Decided May 11, 2021
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1623890

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Bail Appl./2811/2021

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Aneesh.S

Respondent

State of Kerala

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr.justice ziyad rahman a.a. tuesday, the 11th day of may 2021 / 21st vaisakha, 1943 bail appl..no.2811 of 2021 crime no./0 of mararikulam police station , alappuzha petitioner/s: aneesh.s aged 34 years vallyedathu chira, mayithara.p.o., cherthala, alappuzha by advs. sri.v.mahendranath sri.p.t.sheejish respondent/s: 1 state of kerala represented by public prosecutor,high court of kerala 2 station house officer marrarikkulam police station, alappuzha r1 by public prosecutor other present: sri c.n prabhakaran sr pp this bail application having come up for admission on 11.05.2021, the court on the same day passed the following: b.a.no.2811/2021 ..2..orderdated this the 11th day of may 2021 this is an application filed under section 438 of the code of criminal procedure seeking pre-arrest bail.2. according to the petitioner, he apprehends arrest by themararikulam police, in connection with the commission of a non-bailable offence. it is contended by him that, the police is after him and in that circumstances, he has submitted this application.3. heard both sides. the learned public prosecutor submittedthat he is involved in several other criminal cases and there is a non- bailable warrant pending in a case, on which cognizance has already been taken by the court concerned. it is also reported that he is a person included in the 'gunda' list. in the above circumstances, as the police is searching for the petitioner on the basis of a non-bailable warrant, there is nothing to consider in this application. hence, the same is dismissed. sd/- ziyad rahman a.a. judge kkj

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ZIYAD RAHMAN A.A. TUESDAY, THE 11TH DAY OF MAY 2021 / 21ST VAISAKHA, 1943 Bail Appl..No.2811 OF 2021 CRIME NO./0 OF Mararikulam Police Station , Alappuzha PETITIONER/S: ANEESH.S AGED 34 YEARS VALLYEDATHU CHIRA, MAYITHARA.P.O., CHERTHALA, ALAPPUZHA BY ADVS. SRI.V.MAHENDRANATH SRI.P.T.SHEEJISH RESPONDENT/S: 1 STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,HIGH COURT OF KERALA 2 STATION HOUSE OFFICER MARRARIKKULAM POLICE STATION, ALAPPUZHA R1 BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR OTHER PRESENT: SRI C.N PRABHAKARAN SR PP THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 11.05.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: B.A.No.2811/2021 ..2..

ORDER

Dated this the 11th day of May 2021 This is an application filed under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking pre-arrest bail.

2. According to the petitioner, he apprehends arrest by the

Mararikulam Police, in connection with the commission of a non-bailable offence. It is contended by him that, the Police is after him and in that circumstances, he has submitted this application.

3. Heard both sides. The learned Public Prosecutor submitted

that he is involved in several other criminal cases and there is a non- bailable warrant pending in a case, on which cognizance has already been taken by the court concerned. It is also reported that he is a person included in the 'gunda' list. In the above circumstances, as the Police is searching for the petitioner on the basis of a non-bailable warrant, there is nothing to consider in this application. Hence, the same is dismissed. Sd/- ZIYAD RAHMAN A.A. JUDGE kkj

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial