Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Fousiya, vs Havumma,

Fousiya, vs Havumma,

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Orders Decided Apr 09, 2021
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1623142

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
MFA (G & W)/38/2019

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Fousiya,

Respondent

Havumma,

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr. justice a.muhamed mustaque & the honourable dr. justice kauser edappagath friday, the 09th day of april 2021 / 19th chaithra, 1943 against the order/judgment in gop 768/2017 dated 31-01-2019 of against the order/judgment in gop 768/2017 dated 29-06-2018 of appellant: fousiya, aged 39 years, w/o.late abdul jaleel, kuzhikandathil house, chennamangalam village, paravoor taluk, ernakulam dt. by advs. sri.p.m.abdul jaleel (kodungallur) sri.a.g.viswambharan respondents: 1 havumma, w/o.kuzhikandathil abdul khader, koratty mambra desom, kallur thekkummury village, 2 shakariya, s/o.kuzhikandathil abdul khader, koratty mambra desom, kallur thekkummury village, r1-2 by adv. sri.sreejith s.nair this misc. first appeal having been finally heard on 09.04.2021, the court on the same day delivered the following: ..2..judgmentdated this the 9th day of april 2021 a.muhamed mustaque, j the counsel for the appellant submits that the appellant does not want to pursue the mfa. taking note of the said submission, the mfa is dismissed as not pressed. a.muhamed mustaque dr. kauser edappagath pr

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE & THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE KAUSER EDAPPAGATH FRIDAY, THE 09TH DAY OF APRIL 2021 / 19TH CHAITHRA, 1943 AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN GOP 768/2017 DATED 31-01-2019 OF AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN GOP 768/2017 DATED 29-06-2018 OF APPELLANT: FOUSIYA, AGED 39 YEARS, W/O.LATE ABDUL JALEEL, KUZHIKANDATHIL HOUSE, CHENNAMANGALAM VILLAGE, PARAVOOR TALUK, ERNAKULAM DT. BY ADVS. SRI.P.M.ABDUL JALEEL (KODUNGALLUR) SRI.A.G.VISWAMBHARAN RESPONDENTS: 1 HAVUMMA, W/O.KUZHIKANDATHIL ABDUL KHADER, KORATTY MAMBRA DESOM, KALLUR THEKKUMMURY VILLAGE, 2 SHAKARIYA, S/O.KUZHIKANDATHIL ABDUL KHADER, KORATTY MAMBRA DESOM, KALLUR THEKKUMMURY VILLAGE, R1-2 BY ADV. SRI.SREEJITH S.NAIR THIS MISC. FIRST APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 09.04.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ..2..

JUDGMENT

Dated this the 9th day of April 2021 A.Muhamed Mustaque, J The Counsel for the appellant submits that the appellant does not want to pursue the MFA. Taking note of the said submission, the MFA is dismissed as not pressed. A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE DR. KAUSER EDAPPAGATH PR

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial