Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Swathy vs Jibin

Swathy vs JIBIN

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Orders Decided Nov 24, 2021
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1622323

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Mat.Appeal/560/2018

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Swathy

Respondent

JIBIN

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr. justice a.muhamed mustaque & the honourable mrs. justice sophy thomas wednesday, the 24th day of november 2021 / 3rd agrahayana, 1943 against the order/judgment in op 935/2017 of family court, irinjalakuda, thrissur appellant: swathy, aged 27 years, d/o. chettiyattil radhakrishnan,pullut villege & desom, kodungallur taluk 680 663. by advs. sri.k.i.sageer sri.r.rajeev menon respondents: 1 jibin, aged 30 years, s/o. valsan, chithiravalavu, mankattil,methala villege, p.o kandamkulam, kodungallur 680 669. 2 valsan, aged 57 years, s/o. kittan, -do-. 3 geetha, aged 49 years, w/o. valsan, -do- this matrimonial appeal having been finally heard on 24.11.2021, the court on the same day delivered the following:judgmenta. muhamed mustaque, j the learned counsel for the appellant submits that the appellant does not want to pursue the mat. appeal. accordingly, the mat. appeal is dismissed as not pressed. a.muhamed mustaque sophy thomas pr

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE & THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE SOPHY THOMAS WEDNESDAY, THE 24TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2021 / 3RD AGRAHAYANA, 1943 AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN OP 935/2017 OF FAMILY COURT, IRINJALAKUDA, THRISSUR APPELLANT: SWATHY, AGED 27 YEARS, D/O. CHETTIYATTIL RADHAKRISHNAN,PULLUT VILLEGE & DESOM, KODUNGALLUR TALUK 680 663. BY ADVS. SRI.K.I.SAGEER SRI.R.RAJEEV MENON RESPONDENTS: 1 JIBIN, AGED 30 YEARS, S/O. VALSAN, CHITHIRAVALAVU, MANKATTIL,METHALA VILLEGE, P.O KANDAMKULAM, KODUNGALLUR 680 669. 2 VALSAN, AGED 57 YEARS, S/O. KITTAN, -DO-. 3 GEETHA, AGED 49 YEARS, W/O. VALSAN, -DO- THIS MATRIMONIAL APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 24.11.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

JUDGMENT

A. Muhamed Mustaque, J The learned counsel for the appellant submits that the appellant does not want to pursue the Mat. Appeal. Accordingly, the Mat. Appeal is dismissed as not pressed. A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE SOPHY THOMAS PR

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial