Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Chandhu vs State of Kerala

Chandhu vs State of Kerala

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Apr 30, 2021
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1622016

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Bail Appl./2727/2021

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Chandhu

Respondent

State of Kerala

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable dr. justice kauser edappagath friday, the 30th day of april 2021 / 10th vaisakha, 1943 bail appl..no.2727 of 2021 crime no.178/2021 of pothencode police station , thiruvananthapuram petitioner:chandhu aged 25 years moolayil vilakathu veedu, ayiroorpara.p.o., thiruvananthapuram district-695584. by adv. sri.p.anoop (mulavana) respondent: state of kerala represented by public prosecutor,high court of kerala r1 by public prosecutor smt. sreeja v. this bail application having come up for admission on 30.04.2021, the court on the same day passed the following: ..2.. --------------------------------------orderthis is an application for anticipatory bail filed under section 438 of the code of criminal procedure by the accused in crime no.178 of 2021 of pothencode police station. the offence alleged is under section 332 of the indian penal code.2. heard both sides.3. this is a case where a police man wasattacked by the petitioner. considering the nature and circumstances of the case, i am not inclined to invoke the extraordinary jurisdiction vested with this court under section 438 of cr.p.c.. the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is prepared to surrender before the investigating officer. hence, this application is disposed of as follows: the petitioner shall surrender before the investigating officer within ten days from today. in the event of his arrest, , after interrogation, he shall be produced before ..3.. the jurisdictional magistrate. if the petitioner moves any bail application, the same shall be considered and disposed of by the jurisdictional magistrate on the same day itself. sd/- dr. kauser edappagath judge ds 30.04.2021

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE KAUSER EDAPPAGATH FRIDAY, THE 30TH DAY OF APRIL 2021 / 10TH VAISAKHA, 1943 Bail Appl..No.2727 OF 2021 CRIME NO.178/2021 OF Pothencode Police Station , Thiruvananthapuram PETITIONER:

CHANDHU AGED 25 YEARS MOOLAYIL VILAKATHU VEEDU, AYIROORPARA.P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT-695584. BY ADV. SRI.P.ANOOP (MULAVANA) RESPONDENT: STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,HIGH COURT OF KERALA R1 BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SMT. SREEJA V. THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 30.04.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: ..2.. --------------------------------------

ORDER

This is an application for anticipatory bail filed under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure by the accused in Crime No.178 of 2021 of Pothencode Police Station. The offence alleged is under Section 332 of the Indian Penal Code.

2. Heard both sides.

3. This is a case where a police man was

attacked by the petitioner. Considering the nature and circumstances of the case, I am not inclined to invoke the extraordinary jurisdiction vested with this Court under Section 438 of Cr.P.C.. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is prepared to surrender before the Investigating Officer. Hence, this application is disposed of as follows: The petitioner shall surrender before the Investigating Officer within ten days from today. In the event of his arrest, , after interrogation, he shall be produced before ..3.. the jurisdictional Magistrate. If the petitioner moves any bail application, the same shall be considered and disposed of by the jurisdictional Magistrate on the same day itself. Sd/- DR. KAUSER EDAPPAGATH JUDGE ds 30.04.2021

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial