Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Usha vs Gopalakrishnan

USHA vs Gopalakrishnan

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Orders Decided Oct 27, 2021
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1621992

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Crl.Rev.Pet/917/2006

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

USHA

Respondent

Gopalakrishnan

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable dr. justice kauser edappagath wednesday, the 27th day of october 2021 / 5th karthika, 1943 crl.rev.pet no. 917 of 2006 against the order dated 26/7/2005 in cc 1101/2002 of judicial magistrate of first class , kodungallur, thrissurrevision petitioner/complainant: usha w/o subramaniyan,kalapurakkal, perinjanam,, kodungallur. by advs.sri.rajit sri.ranjit babu respondent/accused & state: 1 gopalakrishnan s/o kochavan,thekkiniyedath house, valapad, chavakkad. 2 state of kerala reprresented by the public prosecutor, high court of kerala,, ernakulam. by advs.sri.prasun.s sri.p.vijaya bhanu public prosecutor sri.sanal p. raj this criminal revision petition having been finally heard on 27.10.2021, the court on the same day delivered the following: crl.r.p.no.917/2006 -:2:-o r d e rdated this the 27th day of october, 2021 learned counsel for the revision petitioner submits that she has no instruction from the revision petitioner. she further submits that, however, the counsel who appeared for the revision petitioner at the lower court informed that the matter has been settled. in these circumstances, the criminal revision petition stands closed. sd/- dr. kauser edappagath judge rp

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE KAUSER EDAPPAGATH WEDNESDAY, THE 27TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2021 / 5TH KARTHIKA, 1943 CRL.REV.PET NO. 917 OF 2006 AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 26/7/2005 IN CC 1101/2002 OF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS , KODUNGALLUR, THRISSUR

REVISION PETITIONER/COMPLAINANT: USHA W/O SUBRAMANIYAN,KALAPURAKKAL, PERINJANAM,, KODUNGALLUR. BY ADVS.SRI.RAJIT SRI.RANJIT BABU RESPONDENT/ACCUSED & STATE: 1 GOPALAKRISHNAN S/O KOCHAVAN,THEKKINIYEDATH HOUSE, VALAPAD, CHAVAKKAD. 2 STATE OF KERALA REPRRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA,, ERNAKULAM. BY ADVS.SRI.PRASUN.S SRI.P.VIJAYA BHANU PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.SANAL P. RAJ THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 27.10.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Crl.R.P.No.917/2006 -:2:-

O R D E R

Dated this the 27th day of October, 2021 Learned counsel for the revision petitioner submits that she has no instruction from the revision petitioner. She further submits that, however, the counsel who appeared for the revision petitioner at the lower court informed that the matter has been settled. In these circumstances, the criminal revision petition stands closed. Sd/- DR. KAUSER EDAPPAGATH JUDGE Rp

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial