Vishnu V vs State of Kerala

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Orders Decided Apr 07, 2021

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1620001

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1620001
Court: Kerala Orders High Court
Judge: Honourable Mr. Justice Bechu Kurian Thomas
Decided On: Apr 07, 2021
Case Number: Bail Appl./2612/2021

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Vishnu V

Respondent

State of Kerala

Excerpt

.....bail application having come up for admission on 07.04.2021, the court on the same day passed the following:orderdated this the 7th day of april 2021 petitioner is the 1st accused in crime no.263 of 2021 of mannar police station, alappuzha. he is indicted for the offences under sections 143, 147, 148, 294(b), 452, 323, 324 and 307 read with section 149 of the indian penal code.2. the gist of the prosecution case as against the 1staccused is that he trespassed into the hall room of the house of the de facto complainant along with other accused and he assaulted the son of the de facto complainant on the head due to which he sustained serious injuries. he is a young boy of 20 years.3. the learned public prosecutor opposes the grant of anticipatory bail. it is also submitted that there are criminal antecedents as against the petitioner.4. taking note of the circumstances, i am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.5. however, if the petitioner surrenders before the investigating officer on any date within two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, the investigating officershall carry out the interrogation of the petitioner on the same day itself. if after interrogation, the investigating officer is satisfied that the petitioner is required to be arrested, the petitioner shall be produced before the jurisdictional magistrate preferably on the date of arrest itself. if the petitioner files any application for bail before the jurisdictional magistrate consequent to such recording of arrest, the learned magistrate shall consider the application expeditiously in a time bound manner. this bail application is dismissed with the above observations.sd/- bechu kurian thomas judge dk

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BECHU KURIAN THOMAS WEDNESDAY, THE 07TH DAY OF APRIL 2021 / 17TH CHAITHRA, 1943 CRIME NO.263/2021 OF MANNAR POLICE STATION, ALAPPUZHA PETITIONER/ACCUSED: VISHNU V AGED 20 YEARS SON OF VINAYAN, NELLIKOMATH, KUTTAMPEROOR P.O, MANNAR, ALAPPUZHA - 689 622. BY ADV. SRI.NANDAGOPAL S.KURUP RESPONDENT: STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA ERNAKULAM - 682 031 BY SMT. SREEJA V, PUBLIC PROSECUTOR THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 07.04.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

ORDER

Dated this the 7th day of April 2021 Petitioner is the 1st accused in Crime No.263 of 2021 of Mannar Police Station, Alappuzha. He is indicted for the offences under Sections 143, 147, 148, 294(b), 452, 323, 324 and 307 read with Section 149 of the Indian Penal Code.

2. The gist of the prosecution case as against the 1st

accused is that he trespassed into the hall room of the house of the de facto complainant along with other accused and he assaulted the son of the de facto complainant on the head due to which he sustained serious injuries. He is a young boy of 20 years.

3. The learned Public Prosecutor opposes the grant of anticipatory bail. It is also submitted that there are criminal antecedents as against the petitioner.

4. Taking note of the circumstances, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

5. However, if the petitioner surrenders before the investigating officer on any date within two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, the investigating officer

shall carry out the interrogation of the petitioner on the same day itself. If after interrogation, the investigating officer is satisfied that the petitioner is required to be arrested, the petitioner shall be produced before the Jurisdictional Magistrate preferably on the date of arrest itself. If the petitioner files any application for bail before the Jurisdictional Magistrate consequent to such recording of arrest, the learned Magistrate shall consider the application expeditiously in a time bound manner. This bail application is dismissed with the above observations.

Sd/- BECHU KURIAN THOMAS JUDGE DK

Same Court & Year Kerala Orders · 2021 Same Parties Vishnu V vs State of Kerala Same Judge Honourable Mr. Justice Bechu Kurian Thomas