Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Akhil vs the State of Kerala

AKHIL vs The State of Kerala

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Orders Decided Mar 26, 2021
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1618447

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
WP(C)/7071/2021

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

AKHIL

Respondent

The State of Kerala

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr. justice anil k.narendran friday, the 26th day of march 2021 / 5th chaithra, 1943 petitioner: akhil aged 19 years, s/o. harikumar, residing at kannankara vila, chunakkara vadakkum muri, chunakkara village, cherthala taluk, alappuzha district, pin-690 534 by advs. sri.j.r.prem navaz shri.sumeen s. respondents:1 the state of kerala, represented by its secretary, department of home affairs, thiruvananthapuram, pin-695 001 2 the deputy superintendent of police chengannur, office of the dy. supt. of police, chengannur, alappuzha district, pin-689 121 3 the circle inspector of police, kurathikadu circle, office, kurathikadu, mavelikkara, 4 station house officer, kurathikadu police station, kurathikadu, mavelikkara,by sri sunil nath n.b- government pleader this writ petition (civil) having come up for admission on 26.03.2021, the court on the same day delivered the following:judgmentthe petitioner has filed this writ petition under article 226 of the constitution of india, seeking a writ of mandamus commanding the 4th respondent not to harass the petitioner and his family members unnecessarily. the petitioner is arrayed as an accused in crime no.1085 of 2019 of kurathikadu police station alleging offence under section 363 of the indian penal code, 1860.2. on 18.03.2021, when this writ petition came up for admission, the learned government pleader sought time to get instructions.3. today, when this case is taken up for consideration, thelearned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition. recording the aforesaid submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. sd/- anil k.narendran jv judge

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL K.NARENDRAN FRIDAY, THE 26TH DAY OF MARCH 2021 / 5TH CHAITHRA, 1943 PETITIONER: AKHIL AGED 19 YEARS, S/O. HARIKUMAR, RESIDING AT KANNANKARA VILA, CHUNAKKARA VADAKKUM MURI, CHUNAKKARA VILLAGE, CHERTHALA TALUK, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT, PIN-690 534 BY ADVS. SRI.J.R.PREM NAVAZ SHRI.SUMEEN S. RESPONDENTS:

1 THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOME AFFAIRS, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN-695 001 2 THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE CHENGANNUR, OFFICE OF THE DY. SUPT. OF POLICE, CHENGANNUR, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT, PIN-689 121 3 THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KURATHIKADU CIRCLE, OFFICE, KURATHIKADU, MAVELIKKARA, 4 STATION HOUSE OFFICER, KURATHIKADU POLICE STATION, KURATHIKADU, MAVELIKKARA,

BY SRI SUNIL NATH N.B- GOVERNMENT PLEADER THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 26.03.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

JUDGMENT

The petitioner has filed this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking a writ of mandamus commanding the 4th respondent not to harass the petitioner and his family members unnecessarily. The petitioner is arrayed as an accused in Crime No.1085 of 2019 of Kurathikadu Police Station alleging offence under Section 363 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860.

2. On 18.03.2021, when this writ petition came up for admission, the learned Government Pleader sought time to get instructions.

3. Today, when this case is taken up for consideration, the

learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition. Recording the aforesaid submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- ANIL K.NARENDRAN JV JUDGE

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial