Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Rajkumar vs Vijayakumar

Rajkumar vs Vijayakumar

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Mar 31, 2021
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1618000

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
OP(C)/667/2021

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Rajkumar

Respondent

Vijayakumar

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr.justice t.v.anilkumar wednesday, the 31st day of march 2021 / 10th chaithra, 1943 op(c).no.667 of 2021 os 41/2014 of munsiff's court,thodupuzha petitioners/petitioners: 1 rajkumar aged 29 years s/o.sasikumar, manappattu house, vengalloor kara, kumaramangalam village, thodupuzha2 sreelakshmi aged 24 years d/o.sasikumar, manappattu house, vengalloor by advs. sri.k.c.charles sri.vimal k.charles smt.a.t.renju respondents/respondents: 1 vijayakumar s/o.rajappan nair, aged 63 years, manappattu 2 sasikala aged 50 years w/o.sasikumar, manappattu house, vengalloor 3 sasikumar s/o.rajappan nair, aged 58 years, manappattu this op (civil) having come up for admission on 31.03.2021, the court on the same day delivered the following: o.p.(c)no.667 of 2021 :-2-: dated this the 31st day of march, 2021j u d g m e n tlearned counsel for the petitioners submits that the matter has become infructuous. in the result, the original petition is dismissed as infructuous. all pending interlocutory applications are closed. sd/- t.v.anilkumar judge ami/

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.V.ANILKUMAR WEDNESDAY, THE 31ST DAY OF MARCH 2021 / 10TH CHAITHRA, 1943 OP(C).No.667 OF 2021 OS 41/2014 OF MUNSIFF'S COURT,THODUPUZHA PETITIONERS/PETITIONERS: 1 RAJKUMAR AGED 29 YEARS S/O.SASIKUMAR, MANAPPATTU HOUSE, VENGALLOOR KARA, KUMARAMANGALAM VILLAGE, THODUPUZHA

2 SREELAKSHMI AGED 24 YEARS D/O.SASIKUMAR, MANAPPATTU HOUSE, VENGALLOOR BY ADVS. SRI.K.C.CHARLES SRI.VIMAL K.CHARLES SMT.A.T.RENJU RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS: 1 VIJAYAKUMAR S/O.RAJAPPAN NAIR, AGED 63 YEARS, MANAPPATTU 2 SASIKALA AGED 50 YEARS W/O.SASIKUMAR, MANAPPATTU HOUSE, VENGALLOOR 3 SASIKUMAR S/O.RAJAPPAN NAIR, AGED 58 YEARS, MANAPPATTU THIS OP (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 31.03.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: O.P.(C)No.667 of 2021 :-2-: Dated this the 31st day of March, 2021

J U D G M E N T

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the matter has become infructuous. In the result, the original petition is dismissed as infructuous. All pending interlocutory applications are closed. Sd/- T.V.ANILKUMAR JUDGE ami/

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial