Rakesh T. vs State of Kerala

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Orders Decided Aug 04, 2021

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1614467

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1614467
Court: Kerala Orders High Court
Judge: Honourable Mr. Justice Raja Vijayaraghavan V
Decided On: Aug 04, 2021
Case Number: WP(C)/5762/2021

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Rakesh T.

Respondent

State of Kerala

Excerpt

.....august 2021 / 13th sravana, 1943 wp(c) no. 5762 of 2021 petitioner/s: rakesh t. aged 29 years s/o.thiraviyam pillai, tc no.41/1065, manakkad p.o., thiruvananthapuram, pin-695 009, now residing at tc no.51/1838, perakkonam, mamkulam residence no.f4, pappanamcode, thiruvananthapuram district, pin-695 018. by advs. c.a.chacko smt.c.m.charisma shri.alekh thomas respondent/s: 1 state of kerala represented by secretary, department of registration, secretariat, thiruvananthapuram-695 001. 2 the district registrar (general), office of district registrar(general), first floor, transport bhavan, fort p.o., thiruvananthapuram-695 023. 3 the sub registrar officer, sub registry office, nemom, thiruvananthapuramdistrict, pin-695 020. sri syed m thangal, gp wp(c) no. 5762 of 2021 2 this writ petition (civil) having come up for admission on 04.08.2021, the court on the same day delivered the following: wp(c) no. 5762 of 2021 3judgmentwhen this writ petition was taken up today, smt.c.m.charisma, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, submitted that during the pendency of the proceedings, the petitioner was forced to sell out the property. according to the learned counsel, in view of the above development, the petitioner be permitted to withdraw this writ petition reserving his right to challenge the imposition of stamp duty. reserving the right sought for by the petitioner, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. sd/- raja vijayaraghavan v judge sru wp(c) no. 5762 of 2021 4 appendix of wp(c) 5762/2021 petitioner's exhibits exhibit p1 true copy of sale deed no.990/1/2020 of sro, nemom dated 30.06.2020. exhibit p2 true copy of sale deed no.1211/1/2020 of sro, nemom dated 04.08.2020. exhibit p3 true copy of land tax receipts dated 24.09.2020. exhibit p4 true copy of representation dated 17.02.2021 made before 3rd respondent with copy to 2nd respondent. exhibit p5 true copy of acknowledgement cards signed by respondents 2 and 3. respondents exhibits:nil

Full Judgment

WP(C) NO. 5762 OF 2021 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJA VIJAYARAGHAVAN V WEDNESDAY, THE 4TH DAY OF AUGUST 2021 / 13TH SRAVANA, 1943 WP(C) NO. 5762 OF 2021 PETITIONER/S: RAKESH T. AGED 29 YEARS S/O.THIRAVIYAM PILLAI, TC NO.41/1065, MANAKKAD P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN-695 009, NOW RESIDING AT TC NO.51/1838, PERAKKONAM, MAMKULAM RESIDENCE NO.F4, PAPPANAMCODE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT, PIN-695 018. BY ADVS. C.A.CHACKO SMT.C.M.CHARISMA SHRI.ALEKH THOMAS RESPONDENT/S: 1 STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF REGISTRATION, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001. 2 THE DISTRICT REGISTRAR (GENERAL), OFFICE OF DISTRICT REGISTRAR(GENERAL), FIRST FLOOR, TRANSPORT BHAVAN, FORT P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 023. 3 THE SUB REGISTRAR OFFICER, SUB REGISTRY OFFICE, NEMOM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAMDISTRICT, PIN-695 020. SRI SYED M THANGAL, GP WP(C) NO. 5762 OF 2021 2 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 04.08.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C) NO. 5762 OF 2021 3

JUDGMENT

When this writ petition was taken up today, Smt.C.M.Charisma, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, submitted that during the pendency of the proceedings, the petitioner was forced to sell out the property. According to the learned counsel, in view of the above development, the petitioner be permitted to withdraw this writ petition reserving his right to challenge the imposition of stamp duty. Reserving the right sought for by the petitioner, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- RAJA VIJAYARAGHAVAN V JUDGE sru WP(C) NO. 5762 OF 2021 4 APPENDIX OF WP(C) 5762/2021 PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS EXHIBIT P1 TRUE COPY OF SALE DEED NO.990/1/2020 OF SRO, NEMOM DATED 30.06.2020. EXHIBIT P2 TRUE COPY OF SALE DEED NO.1211/1/2020 OF SRO, NEMOM DATED 04.08.2020. EXHIBIT P3 TRUE COPY OF LAND TAX RECEIPTS DATED 24.09.2020. EXHIBIT P4 TRUE COPY OF REPRESENTATION DATED 17.02.2021 MADE BEFORE 3RD RESPONDENT WITH COPY TO 2ND RESPONDENT. EXHIBIT P5 TRUE COPY OF ACKNOWLEDGEMENT CARDS SIGNED BY RESPONDENTS 2 AND 3. RESPONDENTS EXHIBITS:NIL

Same Court & Year Kerala Orders · 2021 Same Parties Rakesh T. vs State of Kerala Same Judge Honourable Mr. Justice Raja Vijayaraghavan V