Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Dimond Drugs vs the Drug Controller

Dimond Drugs vs The Drug Controller

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Apr 09, 2021
~3 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1614039

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
WP(C)/5621/2021

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Dimond Drugs

Respondent

The Drug Controller

Excerpt

.....nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ or order directing the 1st respondent to take necessary steps to allow the petitioner to take possession of essential medicines as per exts.p2 and p3 purchase orders with immediate effect.2. when the matter came up for consideration the learnedgovernment pleader was directed to get instructions as to why the 1st respondent was insisting on the agreements or dealership of the petitioner with the manufactures and not taking any action on the complaint of the petitioner as it was pointed out that the manufacturer or distributorship shall not withhold sale of drugs to a dealer without any good or sufficient reason asprovided under clause 28 of the drugs (prices control) order2013.3. the learned government pleader on instructions submittedthat a show cause notice was issued to respondents 2 and 3 on 24.01.2021 and they have submitted their explanation, according to which the respondents did not have any objection in supplying the medicine provided there is a proper invoice. the learned government pleader submits that petitioner has to sort out theissues between the party respondents. therefore it is upto thepetitioner to raise the requisite invoice and get the supply of medicine. the writ petition is disposed of accordingly. sd/- p.v.asha rkc judge appendix respondent's/s exhibits: exhibit r1 true copy of license retention letter dated 06.09.2018 issued by the assistant drug controller, kozhikode. exhibit r2 true copy of the purchase orders issued by the petitioner to the 2nd respondent, dated 08.01.2021. exhibit r3 true copy of the purchase orders issued by the petitioner to 3rd respondent, dated 08.01.2021. exhibit r4 true copy of the representation submitted by the petitioner dated 08.02.2021 to the drug controller.

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE P.V.ASHA FRIDAY, THE 09TH DAY OF APRIL 2021 / 19TH CHAITHRA, 1943 PETITIONER/S: DIMOND DRUGS PHARMACEUTICAL DISTRIBUTORS, 19/24C, REGENCY TOWER, VATAKARA, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT - 673101, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER MR. JAIFER RT. BY ADVS. SRI.SHYAM PADMAN SMT.BOBY M.SEKHAR SRI.HARISH ABRAHAM KUM.LAYA MARY JOSEPH RESPONDENT/S: 1 THE DRUG CONTROLLER OFFICE OF THE DRUG CONTROLLER, RED CROSS ROAD, VANCHIYOOR P.O, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695035. 2 L532 LUPIN LIMITED, TRICHUR, 9/520, NH BYPASS JUNCTION, KUTTANELLOR P.O, THRISSUR, TRICHUR, KERALA - 680014, REPRESENTED BY ITS DEPOT MANAGER. 3 ERIS LIFESCIENCES, HOSPITAL, NAIKKANAL, THRISSUR, KERALA - 680001, REPRESENTED BY ITS DEPOT MANAGER. 4 THE ASSISTANT DRUG CONTROLLER DRUG CONTROL DEPARTMENT, KOZHIKODE CIRCLE, CIVIL STATION, MALAPPARAMBA, KOZHIKODE - 670020. 5 THE MANAGER LUPIN LIMITED, B/4 LAXMI TOWERS, BANDRA KURLA COMPLEX, BANDRA (E), MUMBAI - 400051. 6 THE MANAGER COMMERCE HOUSE, NEAR SHELL PETROL PUMP, 10, 100 FEET ROAD, SATELLITE, PRAHLAD NAGAR, AHAMEDABAD, GUJARAT - 380015. OTHER PRESENT: SMT.PRINCY XAVIER, GP THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 29-03-2021, THE COURT ON 09-04-2021 DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

JUDGMENT

Dated this the 9th day of April 2021 The Writ Petition is filed seeking the following reliefs:

a. To issue a writ , order or direction in the nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ or order directing the 1st respondent to take up and pass appropriate orders in Ext.P4 representation in a time bound fashion. b. To issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ or order directing the 1st respondent to take necessary steps to allow the petitioner to take possession of essential medicines as per Exts.P2 and P3 purchase orders with immediate effect.

2. When the matter came up for consideration the learned

Government Pleader was directed to get instructions as to why the 1st respondent was insisting on the agreements or dealership of the petitioner with the manufactures and not taking any action on the complaint of the petitioner as it was pointed out that the manufacturer or distributorship shall not withhold sale of drugs to a dealer without any good or sufficient reason as

provided under clause 28 of the drugs (Prices Control) Order

2013.

3. The learned Government Pleader on instructions submitted

that a show cause notice was issued to respondents 2 and 3 on 24.01.2021 and they have submitted their explanation, according to which the respondents did not have any objection in supplying the medicine provided there is a proper invoice. The learned Government Pleader submits that petitioner has to sort out the

issues between the party respondents. Therefore it is upto the

petitioner to raise the requisite invoice and get the supply of medicine. The Writ Petition is disposed of accordingly. Sd/- P.V.ASHA rkc JUDGE APPENDIX RESPONDENT'S/S EXHIBITS: EXHIBIT R1 TRUE COPY OF LICENSE RETENTION LETTER DATED 06.09.2018 ISSUED BY THE ASSISTANT DRUG CONTROLLER, KOZHIKODE. EXHIBIT R2 TRUE COPY OF THE PURCHASE ORDERS ISSUED BY THE PETITIONER TO THE 2ND RESPONDENT, DATED 08.01.2021. EXHIBIT R3 TRUE COPY OF THE PURCHASE ORDERS ISSUED BY THE PETITIONER TO 3RD RESPONDENT, DATED 08.01.2021. EXHIBIT R4 TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER DATED 08.02.2021 TO THE DRUG CONTROLLER.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial