Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Ramanathan Vs The District Collector

Ramanathan vs The District Collector

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Decided Apr 15, 2026
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1613555

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
WP(MD)/10450/2026

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Ramanathan

Respondent

The District Collector

Excerpt

.....husband had predeceased her. according to the petitioner, except him, there is no other legal heir surviving the deceased jothi. the grievance of the petitioner is that the third respondent has not considered his representation dated 01.04.2025 seeking issuance of a legal heirship certificate.4. mr. d. sadiq raja, learned additional government pleader, whoaccepts notice on behalf of the respondents, upon instructions, submitted that the petitioner’s representation dated 01.04.2025 would be considered on merits within the time frame to be fixed by this court. the said submission is taken on record.5. in view of the above, this writ petition stands disposed of with adirection to the third respondent to consider the petitioner’s representation dated 01.04.2025 on its own merits and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law.6. the aforesaid exercise shall be completed within a period of six(6) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.7. there shall be no order as to costs. index :yes / no 15.04.2026 internet :yes / no ncc :yes / no cmrto 1.the district collector, ramanathapuram district, 2.the district revenue officer, district revenue office, 3.the tahsildar, taluk office, kadaladi, ramanathapuram district.hemant chandangoudar, j.cmr 15.04.2026

Full Judgment

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 15.04.2026

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR

Ramanathan ... Petitioner vs. 1.The District Collector, Ramanathapuram District, 2.The District Revenue Officer, District Revenue Office, 3.The Tahsildar, Taluk Office, Kadaladi, Ramanathapuram District. ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, to direct the 3rd respondent to issue legal heir certificate for the petitioner’s deceased sister, namely, Jothi by considering the petitioner’s representation, dated 01.04.2025. For Petitioner :Mr.D.Packiaraj For Respondents :Mr.D.Sadiq Raja Additional Government Pleader *****

ORDER

The petitioner has approached this Court seeking issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the third respondent to issue a legal heirship certificate in respect of the petitioner’s deceased sister, namely, Jothi, by considering his representation dated 01.04.2025.

2. Heard Mr. D. Packiaraj, learned counsel for the petitioner, and Mr. D. Sadiq Raja, learned Additional Government Pleader, appearing for the respondents.

3. The petitioner claims to be the brother of the deceased Jothi,

who died issueless on 04.06.2023. Her husband had predeceased her. According to the petitioner, except him, there is no other legal heir surviving the deceased Jothi. The grievance of the petitioner is that the third respondent has not considered his representation dated 01.04.2025 seeking issuance of a legal heirship certificate.

4. Mr. D. Sadiq Raja, learned Additional Government Pleader, who

accepts notice on behalf of the respondents, upon instructions, submitted that the petitioner’s representation dated 01.04.2025 would be considered on merits within the time frame to be fixed by this Court. The said submission is taken on record.

5. In view of the above, this Writ Petition stands disposed of with a

direction to the third respondent to consider the petitioner’s representation dated 01.04.2025 on its own merits and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law.

6. The aforesaid exercise shall be completed within a period of six

(6) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

7. There shall be no order as to costs. Index :Yes / No 15.04.2026 Internet :Yes / No NCC :Yes / No cmr

To 1.The District Collector, Ramanathapuram District, 2.The District Revenue Officer, District Revenue Office, 3.The Tahsildar, Taluk Office, Kadaladi, Ramanathapuram District.

HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR, J.

cmr 15.04.2026

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial