Skip to content
Try for free
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.
See full guide →

George Jose vs the Administrator

George Jose vs The Administrator

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Orders Decided Jul 30, 2021
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1613008

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
AI Brief & Ask Semantic Search Verdict Lens Devil's Bench DocMind
Start free trial See sample brief

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
WP(C)/5310/2021

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

George Jose

Respondent

The Administrator

Excerpt

.....come up for admission on 30.07.2021, the court on the same day delivered the following:judgmentdated this the 30th day of july 2021 when the matter was taken up, it was submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner who had challenged the orders of suspension is retiring today and that the society had been delaying their appearance till today to ensure that the petitioner retires without getting relief. the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition without prejudice to his rights to pursue the remedies in accordance with law. permitted as withdrawn with liberty to seek remedies in accordance with law. sd/- sunil thomas judge skp/30-7 appendix of wp(c) 5310/2021 petitioner's exhibits: exhibit p1 a true copy of the order dated 08-01- 2021 of the election commission exhibit p2 a true copy of the order dated 13-01- 2021 of the joint registrarexhibit p3 a true copy of the supersession orderdated 11-02-2021 of the joint registrar exhibit p4 a true copy of the appointment order of the administrator dated 11-02-2021 issued by the joint registrar exhibit p5 a true copy of the judgment dated 23-12- 2015 in w.p(c) no. 38391/2015 exhibit p6 a true copy of the order dated 25-02- 2021 of the third respondentexhibit p7 a true copy of the suspension orderdated 26-02-2021 of the first respondent. respondents exhibits: nil true copy p.a. to judge

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL THOMAS FRIDAY, THE 30TH DAY OF JULY 2021 / 8TH SRAVANA, 1943 PETITIONER: 1 GEORGE JOSE AGED 58 YEARS S/O. K.V JOSE, RESIDING AT KOCHUVADAKA HOUSE, MANNAR, POOZHIKOL P.O, KADUTHURUTHI, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT SECRETARY (UNDER ORDERS OF SUSPENSION) VAIKOM TALUK CO-OPERATIVE AGRICULTURAL AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT BANK LTD NO. 951, VAIKOM , KOTTAYAM DISTRICT

BY ADVS. P.N.MOHANAN SRI.C.P.SABARI SMT.AMRUTHA SURESH RESPONDENTS: 1 THE ADMINISTRATOR THE VAIKOM TALUK CO-OPERATIVE AGRICULTURAL AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT BANK LTD NO. 951 VAIKOM, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT 686 141 2 VAIKOM TALUK CO-OEPRATIVE AGRICULTURAL AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT BANK NO 951, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY IN CHARGE, VAIKOM, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT 696 3 THE JOINT REGISTRAR OF CO-OEPRATIVE SOCIETIES (GENERAL) OFFICE OF THE JOINT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, COLLECTORATE POST, KOTTAYAM 686 001 BY ADV. SR GP BIMAL K NATH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 30.07.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

JUDGMENT

Dated this the 30th day of July 2021 When the matter was taken up, it was submitted by the learned Counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner who had challenged the orders of suspension is retiring today and that the Society had been delaying their appearance till today to ensure that the petitioner retires without getting relief. The learned Counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the Writ Petition without prejudice to his rights to pursue the remedies in accordance with law. Permitted as withdrawn with liberty to seek remedies in accordance with law. Sd/- SUNIL THOMAS JUDGE SKP/30-7 APPENDIX OF WP(C) 5310/2021 PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXHIBIT P1 A TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 08-01- 2021 OF THE ELECTION COMMISSION EXHIBIT P2 A TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 13-01- 2021 OF THE JOINT REGISTRAR

EXHIBIT P3 A TRUE COPY OF THE SUPERSESSION ORDER

DATED 11-02-2021 OF THE JOINT REGISTRAR EXHIBIT P4 A TRUE COPY OF THE APPOINTMENT ORDER OF THE ADMINISTRATOR DATED 11-02-2021 ISSUED BY THE JOINT REGISTRAR EXHIBIT P5 A TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 23-12- 2015 IN W.P(C) NO. 38391/2015 EXHIBIT P6 A TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 25-02- 2021 OF THE THIRD RESPONDENT

EXHIBIT P7 A TRUE COPY OF THE SUSPENSION ORDER

DATED 26-02-2021 OF THE FIRST RESPONDENT. RESPONDENTS EXHIBITS: NIL TRUE COPY P.A. TO JUDGE

Continue Your Research

Same Court & Year Kerala Orders · 2021 Same Parties George Jose vs The Administrator Same Judge Honourable Mr. Justice Sunil Thomas

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial
1M+ judgments indexed

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.

Search Supreme Court, High Courts, and tribunals - then open an AI Brief on any result. Core search is free; full AI desk free for 7 days.

Start 7-day free trial - no card Talk to Sales