Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Reetha, vs Ponnamma,

Reetha, vs Ponnamma,

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Orders Decided Aug 05, 2021
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1612485

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Tr.P(C)/145/2020

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Reetha,

Respondent

Ponnamma,

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr.justice v.g.arun thursday, the 5th day of august 2021 / 14th sravana, 1943 against the order/judgment in op 142/2017 of family court, mavelikkara, alappuzhapetitioner/s/petitioner: reetha, aged 34 years w/o. sunil kumar, lal bhavan, alumpeedika p o, prayar south, oachira. by advs. r.sunil kumar smt.a.salini lal respondent/s/respondents: 1 ponnamma, aged 62 years w/o. soman, valiyatharayil, puthuppally p o, kayamkulam, 690527. 2 sugandhi @ mini, d/o. ponnamma, valokulangara, peringala p o, kayamkulam-690559. 3 thamban aged 47 years, s/o. purushan, valokulangara, peringala p o, kayamkulam-690559. this transfer petition (civil) having come up for admission on 05.08.2021, the court on the same day delivered the following:judgmenton the previous posting date, the petitioner was granted ten days time for taking steps to serve notice on the counsel appearing for the respondents and it was observed that if the notice is not served, the transfer petition will be dismissed for non-prosecution. the registry informs that no steps are taken thereafter. hence, the transfer petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. sd/- v.g.arun judge rk

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.G.ARUN THURSDAY, THE 5TH DAY OF AUGUST 2021 / 14TH SRAVANA, 1943 AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN OP 142/2017 OF FAMILY COURT, MAVELIKKARA, ALAPPUZHA

PETITIONER/S/PETITIONER: REETHA, AGED 34 YEARS W/O. SUNIL KUMAR, LAL BHAVAN, ALUMPEEDIKA P O, PRAYAR SOUTH, OACHIRA. BY ADVS. R.SUNIL KUMAR SMT.A.SALINI LAL RESPONDENT/S/RESPONDENTS: 1 PONNAMMA, AGED 62 YEARS W/O. SOMAN, VALIYATHARAYIL, PUTHUPPALLY P O, KAYAMKULAM, 690527. 2 SUGANDHI @ MINI, D/O. PONNAMMA, VALOKULANGARA, PERINGALA P O, KAYAMKULAM-690559. 3 THAMBAN AGED 47 YEARS, S/O. PURUSHAN, VALOKULANGARA, PERINGALA P O, KAYAMKULAM-690559. THIS TRANSFER PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 05.08.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

JUDGMENT

On the previous posting date, the petitioner was granted ten days time for taking steps to serve notice on the Counsel appearing for the respondents and it was observed that if the notice is not served, the Transfer Petition will be dismissed for non-prosecution. The Registry informs that no steps are taken thereafter. Hence, the Transfer Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- V.G.ARUN JUDGE RK

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial