Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Mohammed Rafi vs Sunitha Jacob

Mohammed Rafi vs Sunitha Jacob

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Mar 31, 2021
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1612185

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Con.Case(C)/444/2021

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Mohammed Rafi

Respondent

Sunitha Jacob

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr. justice a.k.jayasankaran nambiar wednesday, the 31st day of march 2021/10th chaithra, 1943 con.case(c).no.444 of 2021 in w.p(c).no.41265/2017 against the judgment dated 20.12.2017 in w.p(c).no.41265 of 2017(g) of high court of kerala petitioner/petitioner:mohammed rafi aged 40 years s/o.moosa, anjilimoottil house, edathala., p.o.kuzhivelipady, aluva, ernakulam district-683 561. by advs.sri.raajesh s.subrahmanian sri.v.r.rajesh respondent/contemnor/3rd respondent: sunitha jacob age and fathers name not known to the petitioner, tahasildar, mini civil station, aluva, ernakulam district-683 101. by smt.raji t. bhasker, government pleader this contempt of court case (civil) having been finally heard on 31.03.2021, the court on the same day delivered the following: cont. case (c).no.444/2021 :: 2 ::judgmentit is submitted by the learned government pleader that the directions in the judgment dated 20.12.2017 in w.p. (c).no.41265/2017 have been complied. taking note of the said submission, the contempt of court case is closed. sd/- a.k.jayasankaran nambiar judge prp/31/3/21 cont. case (c).no.444/2021 :: 3 :: appendix petitioner's exhibits: annexure a certified copy of the judgment dated 20.12.2017 in wpc no 41265/2017 annexure b true photocopy of the order dated 11.7.2018bearing no eda6/2018-19 issued by the 2nd respondent in the writ petition 9convener local level monitoring committee) annexure c true photocopy of the order dated 19.3.2020 bearing no ki-2833/2018/kids passed by the 5th respondent therein (rdo) under clause 6(2) of kluannexure d true photocopy of the order dated 2.7.2020 bearing no c8.3699/2020 issued by the respondent 3rd respondent annexure e true photocopy of the land tax is it bearing number kl07041307285/2020 dated 12.8.2020 in respect of the above said property. respondents exhibits: nil. //true copy// p.s. to judge

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR WEDNESDAY, THE 31ST DAY OF MARCH 2021/10TH CHAITHRA, 1943 Con.Case(C).No.444 OF 2021 IN W.P(C).NO.41265/2017 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT DATED 20.12.2017 IN W.P(C).NO.41265 OF 2017(G) OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA PETITIONER/PETITIONER:

MOHAMMED RAFI AGED 40 YEARS S/O.MOOSA, ANJILIMOOTTIL HOUSE, EDATHALA., P.O.KUZHIVELIPADY, ALUVA, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT-683 561. BY ADVS.SRI.RAAJESH S.SUBRAHMANIAN SRI.V.R.RAJESH RESPONDENT/CONTEMNOR/3RD RESPONDENT: SUNITHA JACOB AGE AND FATHERS NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, TAHASILDAR, MINI CIVIL STATION, ALUVA, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT-683 101. BY SMT.RAJI T. BHASKER, GOVERNMENT PLEADER THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 31.03.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Cont. Case (C).No.444/2021 :: 2 ::

JUDGMENT

It is submitted by the learned Government Pleader that the directions in the judgment dated 20.12.2017 in W.P. (C).No.41265/2017 have been complied. Taking note of the said submission, the Contempt of Court Case is closed. Sd/- A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR JUDGE prp/31/3/21 Cont. Case (C).No.444/2021 :: 3 :: APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: ANNEXURE A CERTIFIED COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 20.12.2017 IN WPC NO 41265/2017 ANNEXURE B TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE ORDER DATED 11.7.2018

BEARING NO EDA6/2018-19 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT IN THE WRIT PETITION 9CONVENER LOCAL LEVEL MONITORING COMMITTEE) ANNEXURE C TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE ORDER DATED 19.3.2020 BEARING NO KI-2833/2018/KIDS PASSED BY THE 5TH RESPONDENT THEREIN (RDO) UNDER CLAUSE 6

(2) OF KLU

ANNEXURE D TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE ORDER DATED 2.7.2020 BEARING NO C8.3699/2020 ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT 3RD RESPONDENT ANNEXURE E TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE LAND TAX IS IT BEARING NUMBER KL07041307285/2020 DATED 12.8.2020 IN RESPECT OF THE ABOVE SAID PROPERTY. RESPONDENTS EXHIBITS: NIL. //TRUE COPY// P.S. TO JUDGE

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial