Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

The Divisional Controller vs Sri. Sheelappa S/O Yakob

The Divisional Controller vs Sri. Sheelappa S/O Yakob

Type Court Judgment Court Karnataka Orders Decided Sep 26, 2025
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1610178

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Karnataka Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
WP/104646/2024

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

The Divisional Controller

Respondent

Sri. Sheelappa S/O Yakob

Excerpt

-1- in the high court of karnataka,at dharwad dated this the 26th day of september, 2025 before the hon'ble mr. justice suraj govindaraj writ petition no. 104646 of 2024 (l-ksrtc) between: the divisional controller, n.e.k.r.t.c raichur division, …petitioner (by sri. lingraj maradi, advocate) and: sri. sheelappa s/o. yakob age: 52 years, occ: conductor, r/o. h. no. 4-4-101/54/54 zaiabad colony, …respondent this writ petition is filed under articles 226 and 227 of the constitution of india, 1950 praying to issue a writdigitally signed of certiorari or any other appropriate writ, order or by shwetha direction to set aside the award dated 08-05-2023 passed raghavendra location: high by the presiding officer, industrial tribunal hubblli, in court of karnataka i.d.no.181/2017 vide annexure-a in the interest of justice and equity.this petition, coming on for orders, this day, orderwas made therein as under: coram: the hon'ble mr. justice suraj govindaraj -2-oral order1. despite the order dated 15.09.2025, office objections have not been complied with.2. it appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the matter.3. the petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. sd/- (suraj govindaraj) judge gab ct:anb list no.: 2 sl no.: 52

Full Judgment

-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 26TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 104646 OF 2024 (L-KSRTC) BETWEEN: THE DIVISIONAL CONTROLLER, N.E.K.R.T.C RAICHUR DIVISION, …PETITIONER (BY SRI. LINGRAJ MARADI, ADVOCATE) AND: SRI. SHEELAPPA S/O. YAKOB AGE: 52 YEARS, OCC: CONDUCTOR, R/O. H. NO. 4-4-101/54/54 ZAIABAD COLONY, …RESPONDENT THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, 1950 PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT

Digitally signed OF CERTIORARI OR ANY OTHER APPROPRIATE WRIT, ORDER OR by SHWETHA DIRECTION TO SET ASIDE THE AWARD DATED 08-05-2023 PASSED RAGHAVENDRA Location: HIGH BY THE PRESIDING OFFICER, INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL HUBBLLI, IN COURT OF KARNATAKA I.D.NO.181/2017 VIDE ANNEXURE-A IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY.

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER

WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ -2-

ORAL ORDER

1. Despite the order dated 15.09.2025, office objections have not been complied with.

2. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the matter.

3. The petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. SD/- (SURAJ GOVINDARAJ) JUDGE gab CT:ANB List No.: 2 Sl No.: 52

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial