A.J.Jose vs the Greater Cochin Development Authority

A.J.Jose vs The Greater Cochin Development Authority

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Orders Decided Oct 26, 2021

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1609991

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1609991
Court: Kerala Orders High Court
Judge: Honourable Mr. Justice P.V.Kunhikrishnan
Decided On: Oct 26, 2021
Case Number: WP(C)/4840/2019

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

A.J.Jose

Respondent

The Greater Cochin Development Authority

Excerpt

.....kochi - 682 020 3 shalini jose, aged 39 years w/o.jerom, elavumgal house, k.k.padmanabhan road, kochi-682018 4 shyam jose, aged 35 years s/o. a.j.jose, kochappilly anamthuruthil house, chilavannoor, kochi 682 020 5 sam jose,aged 33 years w/o.late a.j.jose, kochappilly anamthuruthil house, chilavannoor, kochi -682 020 (addl.petitioners 2 to 5 are impleaded as perorder dated 26.10.2021 in ia. no.1 of 2021)by advs.t.h.abdul azeez sri.mohammed sadique.t.a ajmal v. a. respondent/s: 1 the greater cochin development authority respresented by its secretary, kadavanthara, kochi-682 020 2 the secretary the greater cochin would development authority, kadavanthara, kochi, pin-682 020 by adv sri.v.rajasekharan nair this writ petition (civil) having come up for admission on 26.10.2021, the court on the same day delivered the following: -2-p.v.kunhikrishnan, j.============================================================== w.p.(c) no.4840 of 2019 - d =================================================================================== dated this the 26th day of october, 2021judgmentthe learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners do not want to pursue the writ petition. therefore, the writ petition is dismissed as not pressed. sd/- p.v.kunhikrishnan judge das -3- appendix of wp(c) 4840/2019 petitioner exhibits exhibit p1 true copy of the lease agreement dated petitioner and the 1st respondent. exhibit p2 true copy of the notice no. 1210/c 14/revenue/81/gcda dated 19/2/2018 issued by the 1st respondent to the petitioner. exhibit p3 true copy of the objections dated before the 1st respondent. exhibit p4 true copy of the notice dted 6/3/2018 issued by the 1st respondent. exhibit p5 true copy of the notice no. 1517/c5b/cmds/gcda/2018 dated to the petitioner. exhibit p6 true copy of the notice no. 1210/c- 1st respondent to the petitioner.

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN TUESDAY, THE 26TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2021 / 4TH KARTHIKA, 1943 WP(C) NO. 4840 OF 2019 PETITIONER/S:
1 A.J.JOSE, AGED 67 YEARS KOCHAPPILLIL HOUSE, ELAMKULAM, ERNAKULAM. 2 OMANA JOSE, AGED 62 YEARS W/O.LATE A.J.JOSE, KOCHAPPILLY ARAMTHURUTHIL HOUSE, CHILAVANNOR, KOCHI - 682 020 3 SHALINI JOSE, AGED 39 YEARS W/O.JEROM, ELAVUMGAL HOUSE, K.K.PADMANABHAN ROAD, KOCHI-682018 4 SHYAM JOSE, AGED 35 YEARS S/O. A.J.JOSE, KOCHAPPILLY ANAMTHURUTHIL HOUSE, CHILAVANNOOR, KOCHI 682 020 5 SAM JOSE,AGED 33 YEARS W/O.LATE A.J.JOSE, KOCHAPPILLY ANAMTHURUTHIL HOUSE, CHILAVANNOOR, KOCHI -682 020 (ADDL.PETITIONERS 2 TO 5 ARE IMPLEADED AS PER

ORDER DATED 26.10.2021 IN IA. NO.1 OF 2021)

BY ADVS.T.H.ABDUL AZEEZ SRI.MOHAMMED SADIQUE.T.A AJMAL V. A. RESPONDENT/S: 1 THE GREATER COCHIN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY RESPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, KADAVANTHARA, KOCHI-682 020 2 THE SECRETARY THE GREATER COCHIN WOULD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KADAVANTHARA, KOCHI, PIN-682 020 BY ADV SRI.V.RAJASEKHARAN NAIR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 26.10.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: -2-

P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J.

============================================================== W.P.(C) No.4840 of 2019 - D =================================================================================== Dated this the 26th day of October, 2021

JUDGMENT

The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners do not want to pursue the writ petition. Therefore, the writ petition is dismissed as not pressed. Sd/- P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN JUDGE das -3- APPENDIX OF WP(C) 4840/2019 PETITIONER EXHIBITS EXHIBIT P1 TRUE COPY OF THE LEASE AGREEMENT DATED PETITIONER AND THE 1ST RESPONDENT. EXHIBIT P2 TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE NO. 1210/C 14/REVENUE/81/GCDA DATED 19/2/2018 ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER. EXHIBIT P3 TRUE COPY OF THE OBJECTIONS DATED BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT. EXHIBIT P4 TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE DTED 6/3/2018 ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT. EXHIBIT P5 TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE NO. 1517/C5B/CMDS/GCDA/2018 DATED TO THE PETITIONER. EXHIBIT P6 TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE NO. 1210/C- 1ST RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER.

Same Court & Year Kerala Orders · 2021 Same Parties A.J.Jose vs The Greater Cochin Development Authority Same Judge Honourable Mr. Justice P.V.Kunhikrishnan