Sreejith vs Geetha

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Orders Decided Oct 01, 2021

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1608969

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1608969
Court: Kerala Orders High Court
Judge: Honourable Mr. Justice Anil K.Narendran,Honourable Mr.Justice K. Babu
Decided On: Oct 01, 2021
Case Number: MJC/85/2019

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Sreejith

Respondent

Geetha

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr. justice anil k.narendran & the honourable mr.justice k. babu friday, the 1st day of october 2021 / 9th aswina, 1943 against the judgment in op (rc) 158/2018 of high court of keralapetitioner/revision petitioner/respondent: sreejith, aged 36 years, s/o jagadeesan, koyikkal, adinadu north p.o., adinadu north, k.s. puram village. by adv neenu pavithran 1st respondent/dh/petitioner in rcop 4/2013: geetha aged 42 years, d/o remani, ambika bhavanam (puthuserril), adinadu north, kottakkumpuram muri, k.s. puram village, karunagappally. 2nd respondent/jd/respondent in rcop 4/2013 nebukumar, aged 45 years, s/o natarajan, raj bhavan, adinadu north, kottakkupuram muri, k.s. puram village, karunagappally. this miscellaneous jurisdiction case having come up for admission on 01.10.2021, the court on the same day delivered the following:judgmentanil k. narendran, j.on 06.03.2019 and thereafter on 17.09.2021, when this mjc came up for consideration, there was no representation for the petitioner. on 24.09.2021, the learned counsel for the petitioner sought time to file a memo to close the mjc.2. today, when the case is taken up for consideration, thelearned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo to dismiss the mjc as not pressed, as the petitioner has already been evicted from the petition scheduled building in r.c.(op) no.4 of 2013 on the file of the rent control court, karunagappally, and as such, the relief sought for in op(rc) no.158 of 2018, which was dismissed for default on 04.02.2019, has become infructuous.3. heard adv. ms. neenu pavithran, the learned counselfor the petitioner. recording the aforesaid memo filed by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this mjc is dismissed as not pressed. anil k. narendran k. babu ssk/01/10

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL K.NARENDRAN & THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K. BABU FRIDAY, THE 1ST DAY OF OCTOBER 2021 / 9TH ASWINA, 1943 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN OP (RC) 158/2018 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA
PETITIONER/REVISION PETITIONER/RESPONDENT: SREEJITH, AGED 36 YEARS, S/O JAGADEESAN, KOYIKKAL, ADINADU NORTH P.O., ADINADU NORTH, K.S. PURAM VILLAGE. BY ADV NEENU PAVITHRAN 1st RESPONDENT/DH/PETITIONER IN RCOP 4/2013: GEETHA AGED 42 YEARS, D/O REMANI, AMBIKA BHAVANAM (PUTHUSERRIL), ADINADU NORTH, KOTTAKKUMPURAM MURI, K.S. PURAM VILLAGE, KARUNAGAPPALLY. 2nd RESPONDENT/JD/RESPONDENT IN RCOP 4/2013 NEBUKUMAR, AGED 45 YEARS, S/O NATARAJAN, RAJ BHAVAN, ADINADU NORTH, KOTTAKKUPURAM MURI, K.S. PURAM VILLAGE, KARUNAGAPPALLY. THIS MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 01.10.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

JUDGMENT

Anil K. Narendran, J.

On 06.03.2019 and thereafter on 17.09.2021, when this MJC came up for consideration, there was no representation for the petitioner. On 24.09.2021, the learned counsel for the petitioner sought time to file a memo to close the MJC.

2. Today, when the case is taken up for consideration, the

learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo to dismiss the MJC as not pressed, as the petitioner has already been evicted from the petition scheduled building in R.C.(OP) No.4 of 2013 on the file of the Rent Control Court, Karunagappally, and as such, the relief sought for in OP(RC) No.158 of 2018, which was dismissed for default on 04.02.2019, has become infructuous.

3. Heard Adv. Ms. Neenu Pavithran, the learned counsel

for the petitioner. Recording the aforesaid memo filed by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this MJC is dismissed as not pressed. ANIL K. NARENDRAN K. BABU SSK/01/10

Same Court & Year Kerala Orders · 2021 Same Parties Sreejith vs Geetha Same Judge Honourable Mr. Justice Anil K.Narendran,Honourable Mr.Justice...