Skip to content
Try for free
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.
See full guide →

Subramanian vs Radha

Subramanian vs RADHA

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Dec 08, 2021
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1607988

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
AI Brief & Ask Semantic Search Verdict Lens Devil's Bench DocMind
Start free trial See sample brief

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
CRL.A/1510/2006

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Subramanian

Respondent

RADHA

Excerpt

crl.a no. 1510 of 2006 1in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable dr. justice kauser edappagath wednesday, the 8th day of december 2021 / 17th agrahayana, crl.a no. 1510 of 2006 against the judgment in crl.a no. 44/2004 of the sessions court, palakkadappellant/complainant: subramanian s/o.narayanan, nedungottil house, chittur, by adv sri.h.badaruddin respondents/accused: 1 radha w/o.raman, devangapuram, chittur taluk, 2 state of kerala represented by the public prosecutor, high court of kerala,, ernakulam. by advs. sri.v.chitambaresh sri.t.c.suresh menon sri sanal p raj,pp this criminal appeal having come up for admission on 08.12.2021, the court on the same day delivered the following: crl.a no. 1510 of 2006 2judgmentthis appeal has been preferred against acquittal. the counsel for the appellant reported no instructions. the counsel for the 1st respondent submits that, to his knowledge, the appellant is no more. the appellant is absent today. in the said circumstance, the criminal appeal is dismissed for default. sd/- dr. kauser edappagath judge ab

Full Judgment

CRL.A NO. 1510 OF 2006 1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE KAUSER EDAPPAGATH WEDNESDAY, THE 8TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2021 / 17TH AGRAHAYANA, CRL.A NO. 1510 OF 2006 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN CRL.A NO. 44/2004 OF THE SESSIONS COURT, PALAKKAD

APPELLANT/COMPLAINANT: SUBRAMANIAN S/O.NARAYANAN, NEDUNGOTTIL HOUSE, CHITTUR, BY ADV SRI.H.BADARUDDIN RESPONDENTS/ACCUSED: 1 RADHA W/O.RAMAN, DEVANGAPURAM, CHITTUR TALUK, 2 STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA,, ERNAKULAM. BY ADVS. SRI.V.CHITAMBARESH SRI.T.C.SURESH MENON SRI SANAL P RAJ,PP THIS CRIMINAL APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 08.12.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: CRL.A NO. 1510 OF 2006 2

JUDGMENT

This appeal has been preferred against acquittal. The counsel for the appellant reported no instructions. The counsel for the 1st respondent submits that, to his knowledge, the appellant is no more. The appellant is absent today. In the said circumstance, the Criminal Appeal is dismissed for default. Sd/- DR. KAUSER EDAPPAGATH JUDGE ab

Continue Your Research

Same Court & Year Kerala · 2021 Same Parties Subramanian vs RADHA Same Judge Honourable Dr. Justice Kauser Edappagath

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial
1M+ judgments indexed

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.

Search Supreme Court, High Courts, and tribunals - then open an AI Brief on any result. Core search is free; full AI desk free for 7 days.

Start 7-day free trial - no card Talk to Sales