Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

P.S.Soman vs Rajeevan

P.S.Soman vs Rajeevan

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Feb 26, 2021
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1607020

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Con.Case(C)/1299/2017

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

P.S.Soman

Respondent

Rajeevan

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr. justice shaji p.chaly friday, the 26th day of february 2021 / 7th phalguna, 1942 against the judgment in wpc 7802/2017 dated 24-05-2017 of high court of kerala petitioner p.s.soman aged 50 years,s/o.sreedharan, parottiyel house,p.o.cheeral,wayanad district. by advs. sri.abraham p.george smt.m.santhy respondent rajeevan aged 50 years,s/o.prabhakaran nair,secretary, sultan bathery co-operative housing society ltd.no.1999,sultan bathery.p.o,pin-673592. by adv. smt.priya elizabeth babu this contempt of court case (civil) having come up for admission on 26.02.2021, the court on the same day delivered the following:judgmentdated this the 26th day of february 2021 this contempt petition is filed complaining that the directives contained in the judgment dated 24.05.2017 in w.p.(c) no.7802/2017 is not complied with.2. however, today when the matter is taken up, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the directives are already complied with. therefore, i do not find any reason to pursue the contempt case any further. the contempt of court case is closed accordingly. sd/- shaji p.chaly judge smv

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAJI P.CHALY FRIDAY, THE 26TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2021 / 7TH PHALGUNA, 1942 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WPC 7802/2017 DATED 24-05-2017 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA PETITIONER P.S.SOMAN AGED 50 YEARS,S/O.SREEDHARAN, PAROTTIYEL HOUSE,P.O.CHEERAL,WAYANAD DISTRICT. BY ADVS. SRI.ABRAHAM P.GEORGE SMT.M.SANTHY RESPONDENT RAJEEVAN AGED 50 YEARS,S/O.PRABHAKARAN NAIR,SECRETARY, SULTAN BATHERY CO-OPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY LTD.NO.1999,SULTAN BATHERY.P.O,PIN-673592. BY ADV. SMT.PRIYA ELIZABETH BABU THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 26.02.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

JUDGMENT

Dated this the 26th day of February 2021 This Contempt Petition is filed complaining that the directives contained in the judgment dated 24.05.2017 in W.P.(C) No.7802/2017 is not complied with.

2. However, today when the matter is taken up, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the directives are already complied with. Therefore, I do not find any reason to pursue the Contempt case any further. The Contempt of Court case is closed accordingly. Sd/- SHAJI P.CHALY JUDGE smv

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial